On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 01:12:39PM +0200, Lars Aronsson wrote: > Mohammed Sameer wrote: > > > I've just created it as a proof of concept so people know that > > aspell can work fine with Arabic. It's still tiny and contains > > only 71,000 words. > > Does this mean it performs the basic task of a spell checker, or > does it also mean that aspell-for-Arabic works far better than > ispell-for-Arabic? > > I know aspell works for Swedish, but I'm not convinced that it is > any better than ispell for Swedish. I don't have any test case to > determine the quality of its function.
Sorry for the delay, Well, No one tried ispell, A few months ago we had the idea that aspell won't even work with Arabic. I still don't know anything about the soundsalike things, Still have a long way to go :-) -- GNU/Linux registered user #224950 Proud Egyptian GNU/Linux User Group <www.eglug.org> Admin. Life powered by Debian, Homepage: www.foolab.org -- Don't send me any attachment in Micro$oft (.DOC, .PPT) format please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html Preferable attachments: .PDF, .HTML, .TXT Thanx for adding this text to Your signature
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Aspell-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/aspell-user
