why? To avoid licensing fees?
Because Browserhawk has flaws you cannot improve? I don't know of one -- maybe others do but I happen to suspect the quality of Browserhawk is high (the author is OCD abut improving it) and OS projects are unlikely to be as high (I say unlikely mostly because the OS ones could even be better if they exist quality is not an OS/commercial issue but BH has a praticularly innovative/obsessive author) but given the cost of someones time to incorporate an OS product if it has cognitive friction may exceed in hours the Browsherhawk licensing scheme. SourceForge.net is a good place to look and others may know of a OS browserhawk alternatvie. I am just curious if a capitalist solves a problem well why another capitalist begrudges them a modest fee -- unless the fees is no longer modest. I have not looked at their pricing in a while so curiosu why you prefer an OS one. Is it about source modification or price? or something else? On 11/29/05, Mike Appenzellar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Does anyone know of a program/code that can get exteneded user settings > such > as session cookies, browser, etc like browserhawk but that is > freeware/opensource? ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> Get Bzzzy! (real tools to help you find a job). Welcome to the Sweet Life. http://us.click.yahoo.com/KIlPFB/vlQLAA/TtwFAA/saFolB/TM --------------------------------------------------------------------~-> Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/AspNetAnyQuestionIsOk/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
