>but Indian govt is sane and democratic, right?
No govt is sane and democratic in
true sense. Is USA govt sane and democratic? Is UK govt sane and democratic? As
long as we think that any govt is ideal and will do all the right thing for the
people in the name of democracy, we fail.
Govt is by the people. Govt is what
we make of it.
We should protest and keep on
protesting against injustice.
India govt over the years killed
50000 Nagas. Was there a single utterance from the Assamese (sorry Asomese)
people?
Think how much they
cried.
RB
On 12 Feb 2006 04:43:58 -0000, priyankoo sarma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>True, but the AASU and even ordinary Assamese are
upset, but they are not carry the placards or shouting Zindabad ULFA, are
they? Further, what do you think an army (uncivilized as they be) will
assume when searching for insurgents that the local people in
this village are showing a.....
And what I am saying here is that
there is no military solution possible of the Assam problem. Otherwise why
is the case that 500,000 Indian army cannot control 5000 ULFA?
If
people are shouting pro-ULFA slogans, do not react to that but try to
understand why people are doing that. In the last 20 years I have never
heard any Assamese daring to shout pro-ULFA slogans openly. The equation is
clear if the people are unhappy with one power structure they will opt for
the other one available. I just want the stupids in Delhi to understand
these emotions of people. I agree ULFA is undemocratic, extortionist
blah blah blah, but Indian govt is sane and democratic, right? In that case
how come a democratic system defy people so bad that people opt for an
undemocratic, extotionist power like ULFA? Think on those lines.
_______________________________________________ assam mailing
list assam@assamnet.org http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
|
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
assam@assamnet.org
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org