Instant communicationa nd globalization is indeed changing the world - causing redistribution of power and income. so stop global communication and go back to stone ages!!?
Umesh
Chan Mahanta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Chan Mahanta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Feeling No Pain
By PAUL KRUGMAN
Published: March 6, 2006
TODAY IN TIMESSELECT
Op-Ed Podcasts
The Opinionator
Times Preview
Now the American economy isn't doing as well as Bush partisans think
it is. In fact, since the end of the 2001 recession, the recovery in
jobs, output and especially wages has been unusually weak by
historical standards. Still, the economy is expanding, so it's
impressive just how large a majority of Americans disapproves of Mr.
Bush's economic management.
Why doesn't Mr. Bush get any economic respect? I think it's because
most Americans sense, correctly, that he doesn't care about people
like them. We're living in a time when many Americans are feeling
economically insecure, but a tiny elite has been growing incredibly
rich. And Mr. Bush's problem is that he identifies so totally with
the lucky, wealthy few that in unscripted settings he can't manage
even a few sentences of empathy with ordinary Americans. He doesn't
feel your pain, and it shows.
Here's what Mr. Bush said in India, when someone raised the question
of the political backlash against outsourcing: "Losing jobs is
painful, so let's make sure people are educated so they can find -
fill the jobs of the 21st century. And let's make sure that there's
pro-growth economic policies in place. What does that mean? That
means low taxes; it means less regulation; it means fewer lawsuits;
it means wise energy policy."
O.K., so you're a 50-year-old worker whose job has just been
outsourced, and Mr. Bush tells you that you should go get a
21st-century education and rejoice in the joys of a lawsuit-free
economy. Uh-huh.
Actually, Mr. Bush's remarks were even more off-key than they seem,
coming during a visit to India. India's surge into world markets
hasn't followed the pattern set by other developing nations, which
started their export drive in low-tech industries like clothing.
Instead, India has moved directly into industries that advanced
countries like the United States thought were their exclusive turf.
When Business Week put together a list of areas "where India has made
an impact ... and where it's going next," that list consisted almost
entirely of high-technology activities like software and chip design.
What this means is that American workers whose jobs are threatened by
Indian competition are, in many cases, people who thought they
already had acquired the skills to "fill the jobs of the 21st
century" - but have just discovered that Indians, who are paid about
a tenth as much, also have those skills.
Am I saying that we should try to stop outsourcing? No. But if you
don't feel conflicted about the effects of globalization, if you
don't worry about the many losers from the process, you aren't paying
attention. And American workers deserve a better answer to their
concerns than yet another assertion that a rising tide raises all
boats, because that's manifestly untrue.
The fact is that we're living in a time when most Americans are
seeing little if any benefit from overall income growth, because
their share of the economic pie is falling. Between 1979 and 2003,
according to a recent research paper published by the I.R.S., the
share of overall income received by the bottom 80 percent of
taxpayers fell from 50 percent to barely over 40 percent. The main
winners from this upward redistribution of income were a tiny,
wealthy elite: more than half the income share lost by the bottom 80
percent was gained by just one-fourth of 1 percent of the population,
people with incomes of at least $750,000 in 2003.
And those fortunate few are the only people Mr. Bush seems to care
about. Look at what he had to offer after asserting, in effect, that
workers get outsourced because they don't have the right education:
lower taxes, deregulation and fewer lawsuits. Funny, that doesn't
sound like "pro-growth" policy to me. Instead, it sounds like a wish
list for wealthy individuals and big corporations.
Mr. Bush once joked that his base consisted of the "haves and the
have-mores." But it wasn't much of a joke. His remarks in India show
that he really can't imagine what it's like not to be a member of a
privileged economic elite.
Next Article in Opinion (2 of 6) >
Related Blogs
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
assam@assamnet.org
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
Umesh Sharma
5121 Lackawanna ST
College Park, MD 20740
1-202-215-4328 [Cell Phone]
Ed.M. - International Education Policy
Harvard Graduate School of Education,
Harvard University,
Class of 2005
Yahoo! Cars NEW - sell your car and browse thousands of new and used cars online search now
_______________________________________________ assam mailing list assam@assamnet.org http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
