I am all for the quotas for SCs and STs who are the real oppressed groups - and 
even some in OBC category --but the real issue is certainly:
   
  ***should have rather focused on ensuring compulsory education for 
illiterates, regardless of the caste barrier. The Bench also wanted to know as 
to why minority educational institutions should be exempted from the purview of 
the 27 per cent OBC quota policy. These are questions which the government of 
the day must answer in candid terms and then apologize for having taken the 
people of the country for a ride so shamelessly. Where is compulsory education 
irrespective of the caste barrier? 
   
  Umesh
  

umesh sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
    Jiski Lathi Uski bhais (whose stick his/her buffalo). or might is right. 
   
  In India majority of people are Dalits so quotas will be implemented (but 
perhaps shoudl not exceed their percentage in Indian population also they 
should perhaps then be barred for general seats -if they are eligible for quota 
seats).
   
   In US affirmative action is not implemented the way it is in India. Even in 
US school textbooks they discuss court cases - for and against quota system. 
Sometimes it is for (Blacks) sometimes it is against -- since African Americans 
(called Blacks here) are only 10% of population. 
   
  Umesh
   
  

Dilip/Dil Deka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
    Is this an attempt to end the (reservation) quota system that was based on 
caste? If the quota system is struck down, will it cause havoc among the 
beneficiaries of the reservation policies? 
  Did the quota system really help in empowering the BC and the OBC, or in due 
course of time under democracy it was going to happen anyway? Has it helped the 
masses or just a few of those who were socially handicapped before?
  Having been away from India for a long time, I do not have a good perception 
of the situation in today's India. My request is for someone in India to 
comment on the news item below so that we can all relate to the issue.
  Dilip Deka
  ===============================================================
  From the Sentinel
            EDITORIAL » »
    Last updated : MONDAY 21 MAY 2007          The Court’s Wisdom
We have said here times without number that it is the Judiciary that has 
rescued the people of this country from the whims and fancies of politicians. 
Had it not been for the Judiciary, our lawmakers, most of whom are also 
excellent lawbreakers, would have perhaps hijacked the nation and its people 
far beyond recoverable abyss. Whether the repeal of the notorious and 
discriminatory IM(DT) Act or the verdict that stayed the implementation of 27 
per cent OBC quota in higher educational institutions — to name only a few in 
recent times — it is the court’s wisdom that has saved this nation of ours from 
being plundered for petty electoral gains. So now as the Supreme Court Bench of 
Justice Arijit Pasayat and Justice PK Jain has referred the 27 per cent OBC 
quota case to a larger Bench on the grounds that the issue involved 
considerable importance of constitutional law having an impact on the entire 
nation and a larger Bench would have to examine whether the government had
 unbridled powers to perpetuate the reservation policies, the nation ought to 
pause for a while and ponder whether the political class has not already played 
havoc with the nation’s just course towards progress in the true sense of the 
term. The apex court’s message of Thursday is clear: that the lawmakers in the 
country just cannot make laws that address their narrow constituencies and aim 
to expand them, such as the casteist vote banks. 
Not only this. The court also said that the government could not adopt any 
‘‘bullying attitude’’ that could impinge on the fundamental rights of citizens. 
It pointed out that the government’s caste-based reservation policy seemed to 
be violative of various provisions like Articles 14, 15, 21 and 21 that 
guarantee fundamental rights. More important — and here is the real rebuke — 
the Bench of Justice Pasayat and Justice Jain felt that if the government 
really wanted to adopt a policy as such — for all-inclusive growth and 
development — it should have rather focused on ensuring compulsory education 
for illiterates, regardless of the caste barrier. The Bench also wanted to know 
as to why minority educational institutions should be exempted from the purview 
of the 27 per cent OBC quota policy. These are questions which the government 
of the day must answer in candid terms and then apologize for having taken the 
people of the country for a ride so shamelessly. Where is
 compulsory education irrespective of the caste barrier? What stops the 
government from evolving a policy to that end? Just because such a policy will 
not fetch votes or consolidate vote banks or create new ones? Or is it that the 
leaders wielding power do not know what it means to drive the nation along the 
path of progress? As for freeing the minority institutions from the burden of 
27 per cent quota, the equation is clear. After all, how can the government 
dilute an existing and infallible vote bank — of the so-called minorities — to 
accommodate other vote-bank interests when these interests can so easily be 
thrust into other non-‘minority’ domains? The court knows how to read the 
politician’s line. One hopes a larger Supreme Court Bench hearing the 
reservation issue would confirm more of this.

_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org



Umesh Sharma

Washington D.C. 

1-202-215-4328 [Cell]

Ed.M. - International Education Policy
Harvard Graduate School of Education,
Harvard University,
Class of 2005

http://www.uknow.gse.harvard.edu/index.html

http://hbswk.hbs.edu/
















http://jaipurschool.bihu.in/    
---------------------------------
  Copy addresses and emails from any email account to Yahoo! Mail - quick, easy 
and free. Do it now..._______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org



Umesh Sharma

Washington D.C. 

1-202-215-4328 [Cell]

Ed.M. - International Education Policy
Harvard Graduate School of Education,
Harvard University,
Class of 2005

http://www.uknow.gse.harvard.edu/index.html

http://hbswk.hbs.edu/
















http://jaipurschool.bihu.in/
                
---------------------------------
Yahoo! Messenger  NEW - crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail 
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org

Reply via email to