YES. Thats correct. In the larger interest of maintaining order, what was done 
had to be done. I dont need to tell you that in a civilized society, you cannot 
allow a few thousand people to run amok like savages, whatever be the cause!

In your country, if anyone were to inflict damage to public property and/or the 
lives of others, he would be shot first by the police and questions asked 
later. So now go and challange your own system first.

Rgds,
Sandip


----- Original Message ----
From: Chan Mahanta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: SANDIP DUTTA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Chan Mahanta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL 
PROTECTED]; Ram Sarangapani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: assam@assamnet.org
Sent: Saturday, June 2, 2007 12:17:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Assam] BBC E-mail: Army deployed after India riots


> However the Gujjars had no business erupting like that with the express 
> >intention of damaging crores of govt. property.




*** And of course that is the unimpeachable truth, because Sandip says so, 
right? And thus them Gujjars DESERVE what they got.


And YOU speak of DEMOCRACY Sandip?


You guys ought to be ashamed of yoirselves.






















At 4:49 PM -0700 6/1/07, SANDIP DUTTA wrote:
Very true Sondon Da - it needs to be worked out with the parties. As you will 
see with most quotas, the creamy layer corner all the priveleges. Hence the 
need for economic reservation.
 
However the Gujjars had no business erupting like that with the express 
intention of damaging crores of govt. property. Hence the results were 
predictable.
 
Rgds,
SD

----- Original Message ----
From: Chan Mahanta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Ram Sarangapani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Chan Mahanta 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: assam@assamnet.org
Sent: Saturday, June 2, 2007 4:06:53 AM
Subject: Re: [Assam] BBC E-mail: Army deployed after India riots

>At 10:24 AM -0700 6/1/07, umesh sharma wrote:

C-da,

 

Sitting in US for long perhaps you have forgotten that there already exists 27% 
quotas in govt jobs and educational institutions in India -- unlike USA. Now 
the demand is that the already privileaged be included in this quota --which is 
not justified.

 

Umesh







**** So WORK THAT out with the aggrieved parties. That is WHAT the legislators 
are sent to govern. If they can't, let them say so, so that a competent slate 
could be returned.




But to stonewall it or ignore it is  bound to result in a bigger problem.




















At 10:24 AM -0700 6/1/07, umesh sharma wrote:

C-da,

 

Sitting in US for long perhaps you have forgotten that there already exists 27% 
quotas in govt jobs and educational institutions in India -- unlike USA. Now 
the demand is that the already privileaged be included in this quota --which is 
not justified.

 

Umesh


Chan Mahanta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

U:







>In most cases it is the politicians (of mostly opposition parties) who start 
>such mass protests - and >demand for reservation -- thats what happened in 
>Rajasthan before the last state elections when the >high-caste powerful groups 
>demanded reservation for themselves - to suppport any party in elections- >nd 
>got it --under current BJP rule.





*** And since it was started by politicians it is NOT legitimate?



That is HOW democracy works Umesh. People look to their representatives, 
elected or even unelected . Usually they are politicians.  But BEFORE they 
instigate their flocks to take to the streets usually there are signs of a 
trouble brewing.  It does not come like hurricane Katrina in a week's notice. A 
DEMOCRATIC government would usually respond to a mass disaffection brewing.





They would NOT  stonewall, or pretend they hear or see anything. And if they 
do, they should be held ACCOUNTABLE, which is an alien word in desi-demokrasy.



So they would make unreasonable demands, won't they?



ALL demands are UNREASONABLE when there is no desire or intent to give anything 
up. But that is not how democracy works. If it is patently unreasonable, or 
unconstitutional, they should be adjudicated in a RELIABLE ( one that cannot be 
bought by the powers in control or the highest briber) court of law. Otherwise 
there will have to be a GIVE and TAKE.



c-da











At 8:21 AM -0700 6/1/07, umesh sharma wrote:

C-da,

 

How can you be so naive. In most cases it is the politicians (of mostly 
opposition parties) who start such mass protests - and demand for reservation 
-- thats what happened in Rajasthan before the last state elections when the 
high-caste powerful groups demanded reservation for themselves - to suppport 
any party in elections- and got it --under current BJP rule.

 


Umesh

Chan Mahanta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Ram:



All that is fine.



Conflicts arise from many different reasons. Economics is one.  But it does not 
somehow make it

out-of-bounds for resolution thru a political process , with adequate 
governmental response to the issues, when they begin to surface. That would 
prevent it from  degenerating into violent protests, like it has in Rajasthan, 
like it did in Assam nearly thirty years ago. Other examples are well detailed 
in Mohan Guruswamy's  Terminating with Extreme Prejudice! forwarded by mcm this 
morning.



The fact is that the UNACCOUNTABLE  Indian govt. with democratic pretensions, 
is little more than a fiefdom of powerful groups and entrenched interests, who 
REFUSE to address these conflicts when they begin to appear, let them fester, 
and when violence erupts, sends out the army to shoot them down. Indian courts, 
long dysfunctional and corrupt to the core, further bogged down  by an 
incredible 30 year back log, are thoroughly useless as a means of conflict 
resolution to the point that Indian intelligentsia does not even think of it as 
a possible INSTITUTION of DEMOCRACY at their disposal: A fact demonstrated in 
this forum routinely by some of the country's most educated and informed, 
including High-court advocates, and NRAs living in developed democracies for 
decades.





Poverty and paucity of resources as an excuse for an absence of  the attitude 
of responsiveness  to constituents' concerns and an absence of functioning 
conflict resolution institutions in what is advertised as a democracy,  does 
NOT FLY. And to suggest that these conflicts can turn violent leading to 
military or police firings and killing of their own people by the dozens at a 
time, routinely, BECAUSE India is DEMOCRATIC is an appalling spin Ram . You are 
doing a disservice to your fellow Indians by telling them such bizarre stories 
about what a democracy is :-).





c-da



























At 8:31 AM -0600 6/1/07, Ram Sarangapani wrote:

C'da


 

>*** That is about the most convoluted explanation of democracy and egregious 
>spin on India's behavior



>I have heard  so far Ram.


 

I am trying to differentiate here: The Gujars and the Meenas are clashing in 
Rajasthan - basically one group does not want the other to get ST status (while 
they, themselves should). Without going into the details who should and who 
shouldn't, the basic underpinning of this whole this is Economics.


 

Neither the Gujars or the Meenas (IMHO) would be so concerned of their 
Scheduled Tribe Status if there were jobs and other resources aplenty. After 
all - the 6th Schedule is only in the Constitution - and whether it is or isn't 
the Gujars and the Meenas will remain whatever they have been  - Tribes or 
non-Tribes. So, why the big rushing need to be included in the 6th - Jobs and 
oppturnities.


 

A mjor cause to most of India's problems (including ULFA ) can be traced to 
economics, wants and needs, as opposed to "we are separate cultural identity" 
argument per se. I would even go a bit further - sometimes even "demands" for 
the preservation cultural identities ties back to economics. Hence, such 
cultural identities prove to be a boon - hence, Marathis/Bodos/Assamese or in 
this case Gujars or Meenas form numbers to jostle for better economic benefits. 
The other thing to fact is political power - ie. politicians play one group 
against the other for such power.


 

--Ram



 

On 6/1/07, Chan Mahanta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>The right to bandhs, hartals, strikes are possible in India because its a 
>democracy and they happen >because there is NOT enough to go around. It does  
>not happen in the US because most of the most >common things have already been 
>met.


 


 

*** That is about the most convoluted explanation of democracy and egregious 
spin on India's behavior I have heard  so far Ram.


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 

At 10:34 AM -0600 5/31/07, Ram Sarangapani wrote:

Oh! I forgot, C'da


 

LA riots (after the OJ Simpson thing), NY Black  out . maybe I am forgetting a 
few.



 

But you are right, the US has far fewer of such riots than India or most of the 
up & coming economies do.  And that can be attributed, in general, to the 
limited resources, and too many people these countries have.


 

If some of the countries have democracies, there are demonstrations, protests 
etc - which often go haywire. If they are NOT democratic then they can be 
quelled swiftly.


 

The right to bandhs, hartals, strikes are possible in India because its a 
democracy and they happen because there is NOT enough to go around. It does  
not happen in the US because most of the most common things have already been 
met.


 

--Ram

 

On 5/31/07, Chan Mahanta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>In the US, we have several examples (which C'da will be glad to expand on, I 
>am sure).



 

*** Yes, but we are comparing apples and oranges.


 


 

>Elian Gonzalez


 

** It was case of enforcement of a court order. No one was killed if I am not 
mistaken.


 


 

>Ruby Ridge


 

*** It was a case of criminal kidnapping.


 

>David Koresh


 

*** Again a criminal case of confinement and refusal to submit to a court 
order, leading to a police/paramiltary raid, to defy which the inmates of the 
commune committed mass suicide.


 


 

None of these were anything akin to political /social disaffections , ignored 
by authorities, leading to demonstrations that turned into rioting terminated 
by military /police firing against their OWN PEOPLE.




 


 


 


 


 

At 8:29 AM -0600 5/31/07, Ram Sarangapani wrote:

Just to butt in here a bit.


 

In the US, we have several examples (which C'da will be glad to expand on, I am 
sure).


 

Elian Gonzalez

Ruby Ridge

David Koresh


 

In the last two, (it wasn't the US Army) but paramil. forces - people got killed

 

On 5/31/07, SANDIP DUTTA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Still waiting to hear what happens in similar situations in US of A - say like 
if some African Americans were to protest again over Hurricane Katrina? Maybe 
we should learn and implement similar policies here.




 

Do they get 125 yrs jail...or Guantanamo Bay?.......or there's political 
settlement?


 

Rgds,

Sandip

 

----- Original Message ----
From: umesh sharma < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: SANDIP DUTTA < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Chan Mahanta < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 
assam@assamnet.org
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 11:56:42 PM
Subject: Re: [Assam] BBC E-mail: Army deployed after India riots

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gujar

it confirms my opinion that Gujjars are not that backward -- in comparison to 
the tribes /castes who are in SC ST category -- nobody oppresses them - but 
they are maig this demand after upper caste have got 10% reservation in 
Rajasthan and Jats -another dominant warrior caste (rules Alwar and Haryana) 
has been included in OBC category by former Congress govt. of Rajasthan

Umesh

SANDIP DUTTA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

"Think deeper" - he he!


 

How much deep info did you have about Meenas, Gujjars etc in Rajasthan? - 
before you read the BBC report?


 

And you already decided it was a legitimate demand?




 

BTW, you didnt answer what happens in the US of A.


 

Rgds,

Sandip

 

----- Original Message ----
From: Chan Mahanta < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: SANDIP DUTTA < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Chandan Mahanta < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 
assam@assamnet.org
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 11:10:05 PM
Subject: Re: [Assam] BBC E-mail: Army deployed after India riots

Sandip:


 

You need to to think a little DEEPER!


 

WHY did RIOTING have to take place to begin with? Did these people wake up one 
fine morning and decided, : Heck, things are dull,  let us go burn some buses 
today and  cut-off policemen's limbs?




 

Think about it and come back with your questions again.


 

sd


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 


 

At 6:06 AM -0700 5/31/07, SANDIP DUTTA wrote:

Hello Sondon Da,


 

As far as I understand, police and RAF are meant to maintain law & order and 
prevent rioters getting out of hand. Thats their job. Army is called in only 
when situation gets out of control. Same approach is applied everywhere. Local 
Admin calls in the army. In this case, Rajasthan police had no experience 
handling anything of this kind in the last many decades.


 

May we know what approach is taken towards rioters who use violence as a form 
of protest and then try justifying it - in the worlds greatest demokrasy - your 
home, the United EStates of Amrika? I mean people who damage govt. property, 
possibly kill and maim others and try to undermine state authority?




 

Rgds,

SD

----- Original Message ----
From: Chandan Mahanta <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >
To: assam@assamnet.org
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 2:59:35 AM
Subject: [Assam] BBC E-mail: Army deployed after India riots

Chandan Mahanta saw this story on the BBC News website and thought you
should see it.

** Message **
This is typical of the Indian state's conflict resolution program, which has 
not changed in sixty years after freedom.

** Army deployed after India riots **
Troops are deployed in India's Rajasthan state after 14 people are killed in 
clashes over government job quotas.
< http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/em/fr/-/2/hi/south_asia/6703133.stm >



** BBC Daily E-mail **
Choose the news and sport headlines you want - when you want them, all
in one daily e-mail
< http://www.bbc.co.uk/email >


** Disclaimer **
The BBC is not responsible for the content of this e-mail, and anything written 
in this e-mail does not necessarily reflect the BBC's views or opinions. Please 
note that neither the e-mail address nor name of the sender have been verified.

If you do not wish to receive such e-mails in the future or want to know more 
about the BBC's Email a Friend service, please read our frequently asked 
questions. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/help/4162471.stm


_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
assam@assamnet.org
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org








Take the Internet to Go: Yahoo!Go puts the Internet in your pocket: mail, news, 
photos & more.


 


 






Get the free Yahoo! toolbar and rest assured with the added security of spyware 
protection. _______________________________________________
assam mailing list
assam@assamnet.org
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org




Umesh Sharma

Washington D.C.

1-202-215-4328 [Cell]

Ed.M. - International Education Policy
Harvard Graduate School of Education,
Harvard University,
Class of 2005

http://www.uknow.gse.harvard.edu/index.html (Edu info)


http://hbswk.hbs.edu/ (Management Info)




www.gse.harvard.edu/iep (where the above 2 are used )




http://jaipurschool.bihu.in/




Yahoo! Messenger NEW - crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail


 






Get the Yahoo! toolbar and be alerted to new email wherever you're surfing.


_______________________________________________

assam mailing list
assam@assamnet.org
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org


 


 



_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
assam@assamnet.org
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org




Umesh Sharma

Washington D.C.

1-202-215-4328 [Cell]

Ed.M. - International Education Policy
Harvard Graduate School of Education,
Harvard University,
Class of 2005

http://www.uknow.gse.harvard.edu/index.html (Edu info)

http://hbswk.hbs.edu/ (Management Info)




www.gse.harvard.edu/iep (where the above 2 are used )




http://jaipurschool.bihu.in/

 




Try Yahoo! Mail now with Unlimited Storage and see the difference.






Umesh Sharma

Washington D.C.

1-202-215-4328 [Cell]

Ed.M. - International Education Policy
Harvard Graduate School of Education,
Harvard University,
Class of 2005

http://www.uknow.gse.harvard.edu/index.html (Edu info)

http://hbswk.hbs.edu/ (Management Info)




www.gse.harvard.edu/iep (where the above 2 are used )




http://jaipurschool.bihu.in/

 




For email that puts you in control, choose Yahoo! Mail.



_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
assam@assamnet.org
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org 







Get your own web address.
Have a HUGE year through Yahoo! Small Business.


       
____________________________________________________________________________________
Get the free Yahoo! toolbar and rest assured with the added security of spyware 
protection.
http://new.toolbar.yahoo.com/toolbar/features/norton/index.php
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
assam@assamnet.org
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org

Reply via email to