Remembering Syama Prasad
Mookerjee saved W. Bengal and Kashmir for India
By Dr Dibakar Kundu
   
  The Indian army could send the intruders away but Nehru, misguided by 
Mountbatten, sent the case to the United Nations to keep it as a permanent 
problem. Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, too, did not want it. I.G. Patel wrote: 
“Pundit Nehru, then, on the advice of Lord Mountbatten, entrusted the question 
of Kashmir to the UNO.” 
  Dr. Syama Prasad Mookerjee’s thinking, intelligence, futurist thought, 
firmness, realistic knowledge and above all patriotism had made him an 
extraordinary national leader. 

He called upon the youth of India to take the fullest advantage of the military 
training, which the government felt necessary to offer primarily in the 
advancement of its own interest. In his words, in the modern age, freedom 
cannot be maintained by any nation even for a single day unless there is an 
adequate armed strength available at its disposal. 

The British had kept India unarmed and untrained, because they could not trust 
Indians. Dr. S.P. Mookerjee said that a highly specialised training in modern 
warfare cannot be obtained by India’s solitary efforts. And yet we need this 
training not in British interest but for our own sake and for the sake of our 
future stability. 

“We demand the right to defend our country, the right to arm ourselves just as 
free citizens of every free country are being allowed today in other parts of 
the world.” 

He stressed that nation must first be physically strong and adequately armed 
before it can proclaim and defend moral doctrines. That nation is truly great 
which has force and strength at its disposal but never abuses them for the 
advancement of self-interest or self-aggrandisement. 

Dr. Syama Prasad Mookerjee spoke of undivided India. But when he came to know 
that partition was imminent, he divided Bengal to create West Bengal. He told 
Jinnah: “You have divided India but I have divided Bengal.” Suhrawardy tried to 
confuse Sarat Bose, Gandhiji, Sardar Patel and many other senior leaders with 
his plan of ‘undivided Bengal’. But Syama Prasad could make out that the plan 
of Suhrawardy was terrible. Firstly, it would remain undivided but later it 
would be joined with Pakistan through Muslim majority in the election. 
Obviously Suhrawardy wanted to create independent Bengal. But Syama Prasad 
opposed this proposal with subtlety. He created a strong movement taking Dr. 
Jadunath Majumder and many other scholars and intellectuals. The Chief Justice 
of Calcutta High Court, Phanibhushan Chakraborty thus commented: “...it was 
then that Syama Prasad Mookerjee interviewed and harnessed all the mighty 
powers he possessed to an organised and determined opposition to
 that plan and he forced a partition within a partition...” 

The turmoil that shook the state of Kashmir in October 1947 was unprecedented. 
Maharaja Hari Singh of Kashmir appealed to India for inclusion in the republic, 
but that appeal was ignored initially by Nehru, who dethroned him to empower 
his friend Sheikh Abdullah. Nehru delayed the march of the Indian army to 
Srinagar, so much so that Pakistanis were almost at the gates of Srinagar, and 
the extraordinary heroism of the Indian army somehow saved the situation. Nehru 
unnecessarily referred the Kashmir case to the United Nations. Nehru agreed to 
ceasefire at a time when Pakistanis were on the run, thereby gifting one-third 
of Jammu and Kashmir to Pakistan. Even today the Kashmir issue has not been 
solved properly. But Nehru did not pay any attention to the precautionary words 
uttered by Syama Prasad. Dr. Syama Prasad felt it very well from the beginning 
that the weak stance taken by Nehru on this particular issue had created a 
grave crisis. Firstly the Indian army could send
 the intruders away but Nehru, misguided by Mountbatten, sent the case to the 
United Nations to keep it as a permanent problem. Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, 
too, did not want it. I. G. Patel wrote: “Pundit Nehru, then, on the advice of 
Lord Mountbatten, entrusted the question of Kashmir to the UNO.” 

On the Kashmir issue, Syama Prasad pointed out that we should withdraw the 
Kashmir case from the UNO and try to settle the matter through our own efforts. 
The dispute still continues about the one-third territory of Kashmir which is 
in occupation of the enemy. On August 7, 1952, in the Lok Sabha, Dr. Mookerjee 
raised the question that “Kashmir is a part of India and we say it. It is so, a 
part of India today in the occupation of the enemy and we are peace-lovers, no 
doubt. But peace-lovers to what extent? That we will even allow a portion of 
our territory to be occupied by the enemy? Is there any possibility of our 
getting back this territory?” And he gave the answer that “we shall not get it 
through the efforts of the United Nations; we shall not get it through peaceful 
methods by negotiations with Pakistan. That means we lose it unless we use 
force” [Lok Sabha Speech 1952]. 

Nehru gave a special and separate status to Kashmir. There was no governor 
there but only ‘sadr-i-riasat’. The chief of the cabinet there was known as the 
prime minister, unlike the chief minister of other states. It had its own 
constitution, separate ganaparishad, and many safeguards. A permit was 
necessary to enter into Kashmir. Durga Das Basu wrote: “The state of Jammu and 
Kashmir holds a peculiar position under the Constitution of India.” It was 
given a special place through Art. 370. Dr. Syama Prasad protested against it 
strongly. His logic was that if Kashmir was regarded as an Indian province, 
there could not be any rule of permit and if the rule existed, it should not be 
regarded as a state within India. 

At that time, hoisting tricolour in Kashmir was a crime, and for Abdullah this 
holy work was illegal. Some patriotic youth opposed the hoisting of the red 
flag of the National Conference in a sports and prize distribution programme in 
Prince of Wales College (now, Gandhi Memorial College). Naturally violence 
against these brave hearts began, and the deputy prime minister Bakshi Ghulam 
Mohammed called for a seventy-two hour curfew to arrest supporters of the Praja 
Parishad. Pt. Premnath Dogra and others were imprisoned overnight in Srinagar 
and active repression was carried out. In the meantime, Shyamlal Sharma, 
executive body member Dhanwantar Singh, Chaturram Dogra, Shyamnathji (advocate) 
and many others escaped from Kashmir to meet Dr. Syama Prasad Mookerjee in 
Delhi, where the latter criticised the government quite harshly. He also 
vehemently protested against the anti-national policy of Abdullah. Sheikh 
Abdullah got surprised which resulted in a fast which the students
 were forced to do. Dr. Mookerjee tried his best to settle the matter. The real 
scenario of Jammu and Kashmir was clear to the members of the Parliament. Still 
different laws were made for the state where the national flag was not the 
tricolour but the red flag of the National Conference and the only slogan was 
that of the party: ‘sadr-i-riasat’. The king was thrown out of the state. 

Really, this terrible condition was prevailing in the state which was becoming 
another nation through the handiwork and reign of Sheikh Abdullah. The whole 
nation was anxious about the state which the Praja Parishad claimed to announce 
as part of independent India with the acceptance of the tricolour as its flag, 
the President of India as its president, the Supreme Court as its highest 
judicial body, and Hindi as its working language. They also insisted on the 
abolition of the Art. 370 under which permanence had been denied to the state. 

But Abdullah was not an idle administrator; rather he ordered lathi-charge and 
gunshots wherever and whenever disruptions took place. Nusir fell prey to the 
claim of the Praja Parishad. Thousands of men and women were imprisoned. Syama 
Prasad tried to make the things clear to Abdullah and Nehru. But both of them 
were too obstinate to admit the reality. 

Syama Prasad took an oath leading the way for the Jan Sangh in the annual 
general meeting in Kanpur to free Kashmir with active co-operation from Pt. 
Premnath Dogra with the slogan, ‘one law, one chief, one flag’. Sheikh 
Abdullah, being the sultan of Kashmir, was not prepared to take the challenge 
from Syama Prasad, and even Nehru was so indulged in a fatal friendship with 
Abdullah that he still paid no heed to Syama Prasad’s precautionary words. The 
result was that Syama Prasad was arrested as soon as he stepped into Kashmir 
and kept under judicial observation in Srinagar. It cannot be asserted whether 
this was pre-planned as this national tragedy was shrouded in mystery, which 
was not properly investigated even after an appeal was made by Syama Prasad’s 
mother to Nehru. 

Suddenly the curtain came down on the courageous leader Syama Prasad. But Nehru 
could not keep Abdullah’s tricky characteristics a secret; within a month and a 
half of Syama Prasad’s demise, Abdullah was arrested and sent to prison. 
However, Pt. Nehru had to concede, though not quite clearly, the proposals made 
by the Kashmir assembly for inclusion in the Republic of India and avoidance of 
plebiscite. But unfortunately Syama Prasad could not witness even bits and 
parts of this success. Truly, Syama Prasad fought for unity among the people of 
India with a life-long dedication of his own self for the service of the mass. 
He sacrificed himself to the cause of mother India; but none could condone the 
negligence (if not conspiracy) of Abdullah’s government leading to Syama 
Prasad’s death. 

In his words: “We believe that imitating other nations India will not prosper. 
We should need to take good values from other nations but it should also be 
observed that no race of India has attained greatness by merely aping the 
others. If we make India into a united whole, the people of India should 
believe in the Indian tradition and ideals, think Indian civilization and 
culture as the origin of inspiration. This is applicable both to the Hindus and 
the non-Hindus of India. The people of India should be Indians mingling all 
religious and beliefs. Even when there is the religious difference, it is 
possible. There should be a cultural unity to make an organised united race. No 
difference of opinion should be there in terms of ideals and future aims of the 
national civilization which is certainly a continuation of ancient pride in our 
tradition and culture.” 

(The writer teaches in Vishwa Bharati University, Kolkata) 

       
---------------------------------
Park yourself in front of a world of choices in alternative vehicles.
Visit the Yahoo! Auto Green Center.
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
assam@assamnet.org
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org

Reply via email to