Dilip-da: 

Is it not natural that this should be so? In a country where the
political and administrative culture has been based on a process of
increasing functional centralization, why would the children of lesser
gods not emulate the children of higher gods? It would run against every
incentive the system has propagated. Is there any nation in the world
whose upper political structure is so crazily centralized - that even
smallest territorial units serve under small czars appointed as "civil
servants" by the central government - and yet have decentralization at
the village/town level?   

Santanu. 

 

 

________________________________

From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Dilip/Dil Deka
Sent: Saturday, September 15, 2007 2:30 PM
To: ASSAMNET
Subject: [Assam] Devolution of Power

 

There are two topics below. They may seem unrelated at first glance. If
you read deeper, you will see the relation that it is the government
officials who want to hold on to their power and thereby do not empower
the citizens who are quite capable of handling some of the functions
currently being handled in Dispur or New Delhi.

Dilip Deka

====================================================

>From the Sentinel

Panchayats on Paper
One of the most vital prerequisites of a healthy 
democracy is the devolution of power right down to the grassroots level.
Unless there is empowerment of people down to the lowest level of the
administrative set-up, we can have democracy only on paper. What is
central to the idea of democracy, therefore, is that there has to be
complete decentralization of all subjects except a few vital ones like
currency, defence, foreign relations, immigration and so on for
democracy to mean anything for the people who ought to be at the centre
of things. But even 60 years after Independence, there is a very strong
vested interest that insists on not delegating to the panchayats even
the powers that were committed to them. This is because a large section
of the political executive and the bureaucracy feel that if the State
government were to give away to the panchayats even half the powers
committed to them, they would be bereft of all power and would cease to
matter to the people any more. This is the very opposite mental attitude
to the one that believes that the state should wither away if there is
good governance. It is also militates against the concept of a good
teacher who should have no regrets about becoming redundant after he/she
has inspired the student to be an avid learner. Devolution of power to
the panchayats also means a considerable loss of income from bribes in
the corridors of power. 
Be that as it may, the Asom Government's reluctance to hand over power
to the panchayats constitutes a serious breach of promise. This is
particularly significant considering that the Tarun Gogoi government has
always been particularly vocal about the devolution of power to the
grassroots level. This should be all too evident from the item on
Efforts to Revitalize the Rural Infrastructure on page 10 of the
Congress manifesto which says (this is a free translation from the
Assamese) that according to promises made, the party has established
three-tiered panchayat elections and involved the panchayats in the
development process and the entire responsibility for development, with
29 subjects, has been given to panchayats. In actual fact, this has not
happened because the State government is quite unwilling to part with
all the powers to panchayats. Things have come to such a pass that
though the government has set up a cabinet sub-committee under Dr
Bhumidhar Barman to ensure the devolution of powers to panchayats in
respect of these 29 subjects, the committee seems quite unwilling to
expedite the devolution of power to panchayats. In other words, the
formation of the cabinet sub-committee would seem to be no more than a
charade for public consumption. And even though the State government
prepared the 'activity mapping' under pressure from the Union Minister
for Panchayats and Rural Development, Mr Mani Shankar Aiyar, there has
been virtually no devolution of powers to panchayats so far. The choice
for Chief Minister Tarun Gogoi is obviously very clear. He can turn our
State into what looks exactly like a banana republic by keeping all
political power with his cabinet, or he can opt for a real democracy by
sincerely empowering panchayats.

 

No Locals for NE Trade
Lately, the Union Government has begun to bend 
over backwards in promoting trade between India's Northeast and
countries like Bangkok. In March this year, DONER Minister Mani Shankar
Aiyar led a delegation of businessmen from the Northeast to Thailand.
This was reciprocated by the Thai Commerce Minister leading two
high-level delegations to India, one to attend the 3rd Northeast
Business Summit in New Delhi and another subsequently to the Northeast.
It is in the fitness of things, therefore, that a Northeast Investment
Week is being planned to begin in Bangkok on October 2, 2007. While all
this is very well, what the people of the Northeast would like to know
is why entrepreneurs of the Northeast should always be denied the trade
already being generated as a result of such exchanges - in the form of
air travel, arrangement of accommodation in Bangkok etc. We know for a
fact that local travel agents had made a bid for the air travel bookings
and for the arrangements for hotel bookings in Bangkok. Those who have
travelled abroad extensively with local travel agents handling all their
travel arrangements will vouch that they provide as good service as any
travel agent in the metropolitan cities of India. The crucial question
is: why should the organizers of such meets create a vested interest
which is hell-bent on denying all opportunities to local entrepreneurs?
How is it going to look for DONER and the Union Government if someone
decides to tell the Thai counterparts that entrepreneurs of the
Northeast are regarded as such outcasts that even the travel
arrangements had to be entrusted to a Kolkata firm? The next question to
follow should be: Are you planning to do business with a group of
businessmen who are considered by their own government as being quite
incompetent even to make the travel arrangements for this trip? The
answers should be very edifying indeed.

 

_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
[email protected]
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org

Reply via email to