I am in receipt of a cc of your reply to Mt Shantikam Hazarika. maybe wrongly included due to mistaken identity. I see reference to Nayan Parasar in the reply so maybe you have thought me to be him which is not correct. But anyways I would not want to deprive myself of this opportunity of talking directly with you.
It is good to know that you are open to debates and discussion, but I would like to suggest that since you have indicated in most clear words that you are open to queries and discussions, would it not be even better if you move a step ahead and include the masses of Assam alongwith the Assamnetters in a meaningful discussion regarding the necessity of a National Liberation Struggle of Asom as the persons indulging in a dialogue over the issue in assamnet are a mere handful and do not amount to a majority of the Assamese masses. I am sure since as per your own admission, the modern communications have made the world a small place, you will have no difficulty in engaging in dialogue with the masses. But then there is one more thing i would like to bring to your notice. We all are aware of the aim of the ULFA in the past Twenty Eight years of struggle. But then, we also are aware to this fact that times have changed. So, the onus is on you to convince us and the masses if the same conditions prevails now and are relevant which were there 28 years back. I would be glad to know as I was only about 4 months old when the liberation struggle started. After all as you proclaim, you are struggling on behalf of the masses of Assam, it becomes your foremost duty and obligation to secure for the masses what the government could not. i.e., peace and prosperity etc., Also you need to convince us and the masses as to why you are better than the government and why the masses should support you. Regards, Nayanjyoti Medhi P.S: By the way the font used in the reply to Shri Shantikam Hazarika is Times New Roman while the Signature is in Courier New. Whoever drafted your reply did a good job. On 10/11/07, ulfa_ 1979April7 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Mr Shantikam Hazarika, > > Your relevant mail has proven that, your real intention is to destroy the > National Liberation Struggle of Asom by attacking Ruby Bhuyan of the ULFA > like a rabid dog biting people on the street indiscriminately. We thank you > for revealing your design. > > We do not wish to insult you by trying to make you knowledgeable how the > modern communications have made the world a small place. However, we are at > a loss to make out why are you unaware of the aim of the ULFA¢s past > Twenty-Eight years of struggle in Asom? Excepting a yokel, a person like you > well versed in advanced technology, should not have to come up with such a > view. > The debate in question was not put forward in a manner of your requirement > of ¡asked them in plain, straight forward English¢. You are trying to throw > blows in the air just to sweep this deficiency under the carpet. We would > like to remind you that the debate took place as a result of Nayan Parasar > criticizing impertinently in the Asom On Line forum ¡the get well wish¢ > statement of our Honourable Chairman Arobinda Rajkhowa when Dr. Mamoni > Goswami fell ill. Criticism of a ¡Get well wish¢ cannot be ¡Honest,gentle, > civilized¢. But you approving his subterfuge and attacking the ULFA with > vindictive words have been noted in the net. > > You may not be aware that about ten years ago Prof. Jugal Kalita linking > the ULFA website to the Assam Org site there was an objection raised by one > Supratik Gupta. Following this there was a long debate between Arun Mahanta, > a member of the ULFA¢s Central Publicity Group and Supratik Gupta. In this > debate, Supratik was given detailed replies with unambiguous views the ULFA > holds. Supratik Gupta was not satisfied with it, but, the ULFA was very > frank in giving out replies. He wished to know what his status would be in a > Sovereign Independent Assam to a person of Bangladesh origin. We must say > that Supratik Gupta behaved like a gentleman. On the other hand your good > man Nayan Parasar does not sound at all a gentleman, but a sycophant bent > upon keeping Asom under colonial occupation forever. We are analysing of the > reasons why should you be promoting the sycophancy of Parasar as something > very honourable. > > If you really want a useful discussion, you are welcome to come forward in > earnest. Do you think only your type are the ones who deserves respect? You > do not have to instigate any one to have a debate with us. In this instant > what has unfolded puts you in the same defiled platform as with Nayan Parasr > and Utpal Borpujari. Otherwise we could have a meaningful dignified debate > in the meantime. Instead of scornfulness and insulting, a simple request on > the query would have an appropriate approach. Now, in trying to prove the > mastery of English or lack of it, has pushed aside our willing to be engaged > in a meaningful discussion from the original debate. There is saying, ¡Faith > is all about belief and destructive criticism shakes such beliefs¢ and a > similar response by yourselves has ruined the possibility of productive > engagement in this instance. Why are you all trying to damage the Mahanta > brothers now? > > > Rubi bhuyan > > central publicity member,ulfa > > > > ------------------------------ > Are you a hoarder? Then you'll love Yahoo! > Mail<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/mailuk/taglines/hotmail/hoarder/*http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=48524/*http://uk.mail.yahoo.com>with > unlimited storage. > > -- Nayanjyoti Medhi Advocate Gauhati High Court Chamber: Satya Bora Lane, Dighalipukhuri East Guwahati-781001, Assam Phone: +91 361 2416960 +91 94350 43007 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________ assam mailing list assam@assamnet.org http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org
