Amidst protests against price rises of essential items throughout the
country, the PM Manmohan Singh has again started harping on the issue of the
Indo-US Nuclear Deal. The Deal has been pushed forward in India in an
anti-democratic manner without approval of the Parliament - in fact in the
teeth of opposition by a large majority of parliamentarians. The Deal has
the potential of disturbing regional stability and further distorting India
's relationships with important neighbours like China , Pakistan and Iran.

This cannot also but severely undermine the prospects for both vertical and
horizontal non-proliferation and thereby the prospects for global nuclear
disarmament. This allurement also has the danger of further propelling India
towards becoming a junior military ally of the US and a market to mint
profits for its MNCs and also the nuclear industry of other advanced
countries -- Russia and France, in particular.

Most importantly it will be a set back to the environmentally friendly
sustainable ways of meeting our energy requirements. Power from nuclear
energy is a failed project in developed countries and the eagerness of the
Prime Minister to clinch the Deal fails to generate any enthusiasm among the
common people of India. Neither is nuclear energy a solution to global
warming as some experts make it out to be. On the contrary the entire
nuclear fuel cycle is fraught with danger and exposes human beings to
hazardous radiation. The world is yet to find a safe way for disposal of
radioactive waste, a factor which is constraining the growth of nuclear
power programmes in the developed countries.

The US, UK, Canada, Germany, France, Japan all seem to be reviewing their
nuclear energy programmes and commissioning of new nuclear power plants in
all these countries has almost come to a stand still. Australia , the
biggest supplier of Uranium in the world, is yet to initiate a nuclear power
programme. Everybody has realized there is no future in nuclear energy.
Advanced countries are looking for alternatives. But because of the
parochial vision of our government the ruling class of this country has
become obsessed with the nuclear option without any clear understanding of
its implications. There seems to be a superficial feeling that this Deal is
somehow going to enhance the stature of India in the community of nations.
Hence it is matter of vanity and false sense of pride with possibly no
concrete benefits for the people of this country.

A Planning Commission study shows that even with the best possible estimates
of capacity addition in power generation after the Deal is through, the
country is not going to increase its share of electricity from nuclear
energy from the present 3% to more than 7-9%. And this would come at a huge
cost -- financially and politically. We would be required to bring our
foreign policy in line with the US policy as has been already exhibited by
India being forced to vote against Iran in the IAEA meeting.

The Indo-US Nuclear Deal is meant to serve the interests of the global
nuclear power industry and is a ploy to keep India away from staking claims
to shrinking fossil fuel reserves in proportion to its large population so
that these reserves may last for some more time for the rich countries.

The undue importance given to the Indo-US Nuclear Deal as opposed to the
Iran-Pakistan-India gas pipeline, even though gas is predicted to be the
major source of power globally for the next two to three decades, raises
questions about the motives of the Indian government.

The most diabolical aspect of the Deal is the increasing military proximity
between the US and India . Joint Indo-US military exercises have already
been going on for the last seven years with the aim of building
interoperability.

A Counter-Insurgency and Jungle Warfare School has been established at
Vairengte in Mizoram. The US Congress has been briefed that in a war that is
being predicted with China in about fifteen years from now, the US would
like to see India on its side. US envisions a military base for itself on
India soil soon.

The increasing militarization of the India State is also being used to
stifle civil liberties and democratic movements in the country. India must
learn a lesson from the history of US military involvement in various parts
of the world which have been left devastated. It is dangerous to have the US
as an enemy but fatal to have as a friend.

The friendship and the elusive geo-political status or possibly a seat in
the Security Council, whatever the Government of India is aspiring for, is
going to come at the cost of loss of sovereignty to the nation. Our status
will be reduced to that of a second rate UK or Israel .

In the face of unprecedented pressure mounted by the US , the Left Front, a
partner in the UPA alliance, must be congratulated for successfully stalling
the Indo-US Nuclear Deal up till now. The Deal is now stuck at the stage of
finalizing a India specific agreement with the IAEA. The Left party leaders
have displayed foresight in foiling the US hegemonic designs in South Asia
even though they have yet to take an ideological position against the
nuclear power programme.

Manmohan Singh, who talked about renewable energy for the last time at NAM
meeting two years ago, has directed the Ministry of New and Renewable Energy
to draft an umbrella legislation for promotion and growth of renewable
energy, under duress. It would make more political, economic and
environmental sense for India to pursue a path of self reliant renewable
energy programme for fulfilling its need rather than the elusive nuclear
energy for which we'll always be at the mercy of external agencies. But then
India will have to give up its own hegemonic designs of acting as a regional
military super power.

Clean source of energy will have to be accompanied by clean politics. India
will have to work on the agenda of regional peace, disarmament and stability
rather than converting it into a region of warfare. If Manmohan Singh
embarks on this twin objective programme, he would be remembered for his
wisdom more than he would be if he were to finalize the Indo-US Nuclear
Deal. He would favourably alter the course of history of not only this
nation but also possibly the world towards a cleaner, safer and secure
future.

*- Dr Sandeep Pandey*

(The author is a Ramon Magsaysay Awardee (2002) for emergent leadership,
heads the National Alliance of People's Movements (NAPM) and did his PhD
from University of California, Berkeley in control theory which is
applicable in missile technology. He can be contacted at:
[EMAIL PROTECTED])

http://www.assamtimes.org/Editorial/1717.html
_______________________________________________
assam mailing list
assam@assamnet.org
http://assamnet.org/mailman/listinfo/assam_assamnet.org

Reply via email to