This article from NYTimes.com 
has been sent to you by [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Price of Iraqy Freedom.

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

/-------------------- advertisement -----------------------\

Explore more of Starbucks at Starbucks.com.
http://www.starbucks.com/default.asp?ci=1015
\----------------------------------------------------------/

British Arms Expert at Center of Dispute on Iraq Data Is Found Dead, His Wife Says

July 19, 2003
 By WARREN HOGE with JUDITH MILLER 




 

LONDON, July 18 - The arms expert at the center of a
dispute about whether the British government doctored its
intelligence reports on Iraq's weapons programs to gain
public support for going to war was found dead this morning
near his home in Oxfordshire, his wife said today. 

The weapons specialist, Dr. David Kelly, left his home on
Thursday afternoon saying he was going for a walk and never
returned, his wife, Jan Kelly, said in a telephone
interview today. 

Mrs. Kelly said the police had confirmed that the body was
her husband's, and that the cause of death was suicide. She
declined to say what led the police to that conclusion,
saying they had asked her not to discuss details of his
death. 

Dr. Kelly, 59, an Oxford-educated former United Nations
weapons inspector in Iraq with a specialty in biological
weapons, faced tough questioning on Tuesday from the House
of Commons Select Committee on Foreign Affairs about
whether he had been the source of an accusation broadcast
by the BBC that the British government had doctored
intelligence findings in its campaign to gain public
support for going to war in Iraq. 

The body was discovered on a woodland footpath five miles
from the Kelly residence. The acting superintendent of the
Thames Valley police, Dave Purnell, said a formal
identification would be made on Saturday, but that the
description of the body matched that of Dr. Kelly. Calling
the case an "unexplained death," Mr. Purnell declined to
discuss possible causes. 

Mrs. Kelly said her husband had worked on Thursday morning
on a report he said he owed the Foreign Office and had sent
some e-mail messages to friends. "After lunch, he went out
for a walk to stretch his legs as he usually does," she
said. 

She had no indication that her husband was contemplating
suicide, she said. "But he had been under enormous stress,
as we all had been," she said. 

Dr. Kelly, whose title was senior adviser on weapons of
mass destruction, might have unwittingly become caught up
in a painfully public political storm for which his
experience as a respected expert on bioterrorism and his
personal life as an intensely private family man had not
prepared him. 

A soft-spoken civil servant in the Ministry of Defense
accustomed to working behind the scenes, Dr. Kelly was
pressed repeatedly by committee members about his role in
the bitter dispute that has pitted the government against
the BBC and been front-page news in Britain during the last
week. 

Prime Minister Tony Blair's powerful communications and
security director, Alastair Campbell, has conducted a
wide-ranging campaign against the BBC, the world's largest
public service broadcaster, alleging that it has let its
vaunted standards of impartiality lapse in the pursuit of
what he has called "an agenda against the war." 

In an e-mail message to a reporter sent hours before he
left for his walk, Dr. Kelly gave no indication that he was
depressed. He said he was waiting "until the end of the
week" before judging how his appearance before the
committee had gone, and referred to "many dark actors
playing games." Based on earlier conversations with Dr.
Kelly, the words seemed to refer to people within the
Ministry of Defense and Britain's intelligence agencies
with whom he had often sparred over interpretations of
intelligence reports. 

Another associate who also received an e-mail message sent
by Dr. Kelly shortly before he left the house said the
message was combative and expressed a determination to
overcome the scandal encircling him and an enthusiasm about
returning to Iraq. 

Mr. Blair was told about the discovery of the body during a
flight to Tokyo from Washington today, and upon his
arrival, his spokesman said, "The prime minister is
obviously very distressed for the family." 

Mr. Blair is on the second leg of a weeklong journey that
began Thursday and included meetings with President Bush
and an address to a joint meeting of Congress. 

Tom Mangold, a journalist for the British news network ITV
and a friend of Dr. Kelly's, said he had spoken this
morning to Mrs. Kelly, who said her husband had been "very,
very angry about what had happened at the committee" on
Tuesday. 

"She didn't use the word `depressed,' " Mr. Mangold said,
"but she said he was very, very stressed and unhappy about
what had happened and this was really not the kind of world
he wanted to live in." 

The case that put Dr. Kelly in the public eye arose from a
report broadcast on May 29 asserting that a high-ranking
Downing Street official had "sexed up" a government
intelligence dossier by inserting a claim that Mr. Hussein
had chemical and biological weapons that could be deployed
in 45 minutes. 

The BBC reporter, Andrew Gilligan, who covers military
affairs, said the insertion had been made against the
wishes of intelligence agencies. The weapons claim was the
highlight of the report published by the government to
persuade a dubious British public that military action was
needed in Iraq. 

Mr. Gilligan attributed his account to a senior weapons
scientist he had met at a downtown London hotel. He did not
identify the high-ranking Downing Street official on the
air, but subsequently wrote in a newspaper article that it
was Mr. Campbell. 

Mr. Campbell reacted with fury and challenged Mr. Gilligan
to produce his source. Mr. Campbell collected denials from
the intelligence agencies involved, demanded an apology
from the BBC and testified before the committee that later
was to hear from Dr. Kelly. 

When Dr. Kelly originally volunteered to Defense Ministry
managers in early July that he had met with Mr. Gilligan at
a downtown hotel on May 22, Mr. Campbell seized the
opportunity to challenge the BBC to say whether he was Mr.
Gilligan's source for the report. 

The BBC refused, citing its practice of not identifying
people who provide information on condition of anonymity.
Mr. Campbell retorted that Dr. Kelly himself had withdrawn
the request. 

The foreign affairs committee then invited Dr. Kelly to
testify, and he appeared on Tuesday, saying that he did not
believe that he was the "main source" for the story. 

As a witness, Dr. Kelly sat hunched over the desk in front
of him, looking troubled and uncomfortable under the
pointed questioning of members of the parliamentary panel.
On several occasions, lawmakers asked him to raise his
voice so they could hear his responses. 

"I reckon you're the chaff thrown up to divert our
probing," Andrew Mackinlay, a Labor Party member, said as
Dr. Kelly squirmed in the witness chair. "Have you ever
felt like the fall guy? I mean, you've been set up, haven't
you?" 

Dr. Kelly said quietly that he was in no position to answer
the question. 

Sir John Stanley, a Conservative, said, "You were being
exploited to rubbish Gilligan and his source, quite
clearly." 

Dr. Kelly replied, "I've just found myself in this position
out of my own honesty of acknowledging that fact that I had
interacted with him." 

Donald Anderson, chairman of the committee, said today that
he did not believe the questioning was overly aggressive,
but said, "It was wholly outside his normal experience,
therefore must have certainly been an ordeal for him." 

Richard Ottaway, another committee Conservative, said:
"There are games going on here, there are people trying to
make points, trying to shut down avenues of inquiry, trying
to open up things. But putting up Dr. Kelly was just part
of the distraction, and it's had the most ghastly result,
and I am deeply critical of those involved." 

On Thursday, Mr. Gilligan, the BBC reporter, appeared
before the committee again and afterward Mr. Anderson read
a statement calling him an "unsatisfactory witness" and
accusing him of changing his story from his first
appearance. Mr. Gilligan denied the charge and called the
committee a "hanging jury." 

The Ministry of Defense said it would hold an independent
judicial inquiry into the circumstances of Dr. Kelly's
death, but the government showed no signs tonight of bowing
to the growing demands from members of Parliament for a
full-scale independent judicial look into the whole issue
of weapons intelligence. 

A ministry spokesman said Dr. Kelly had at no point been
threatened with suspension or dismissal as a result of his
admission that he had spoken to Mr. Gilligan, a technical
violation of civil service rules. The ministry said he had
been given five days to consider the consequences of going
public before the disclosure was announced and that he had
been told he might end up being called to testify before
Parliament. 

Robert Jackson, the Conservative member of Parliament from
Dr. Kelly's Oxfordshire district, said that if the
scientist had committed suicide, the responsibility lay not
with the government but with the BBC. 

The BBC limited its comment to an expression of condolences
to the Kelly family. "Whilst Dr. Kelly's family await the
formal identification, it would not be appropriate for us
to make any further statement," the BBC said. 

http://www.nytimes.com/2003/07/19/international/worldspecial/19BRIT.html?ex=1059632234&ei=1&en=7365bb5ef17ee41c


---------------------------------

Get Home Delivery of The New York Times Newspaper. Imagine
reading The New York Times any time & anywhere you like!
Leisurely catch up on events & expand your horizons. Enjoy
now for 50% off Home Delivery! Click here:

http://www.nytimes.com/ads/nytcirc/index.html



HOW TO ADVERTISE
---------------------------------
For information on advertising in e-mail newsletters 
or other creative advertising opportunities with The 
New York Times on the Web, please contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or visit our online media 
kit at http://www.nytimes.com/adinfo

For general information about NYTimes.com, write to 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]  

Copyright 2003 The New York Times Company

_______________________________________________
Assam mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/listinfo/assam

Reply via email to