Hi A:
>and you some Anti-India. *** Is Hindu-nationalism equated to be pro-Indianism therefore, so that if one is not a Hindu nationalism supporter them he/she must be anti-Indian by default :-)? c-da At 10:52 AM -0500 9/26/03, Alpana B. Sarangapani wrote: > > >>shedding some hindu-nationalism baggage to become able to see things more >>clearly. > > > >and you some Anti-India. > > > >:) > > > > > > > >From: Chan Mahanta >To: "deepjyoti kakati" , >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [Assam] re: replacing bridges in 9 >hours >Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 09:52:01 -0500 > > >1. it was a election >publicity stunt by govt > >2. no minorities were given chance to be >labour > >3. its all a fake, everything from india is a fake > >4. its a >conspiracy against assam (as usual) > >5. why 140 yr old bridge was there >in first place > >6. has anyone done a audit of cost incurred > >7. its >delhis fault! (as usual) > >8. it proves india is a sectarian country > >>9. St. louis under your guidance did a 10km bridge in 2 hrs. > >10. >incite a tangential flamewar to hide the original issue > > > >*** >Those were excellent attempts at reading my mind. But it is really not >a >very fruitful pursuit to try and PREDICT what MY responses might be. It >>is a sure way to get oneself upset with no other conceivable benefit. > >>A far better approach would have been to deal with the issue in point. > >>*** In this instance the issue was with the news report, the information >>contained in ( or missing from) the report , and if that was ADEQUATE to >>judge >the MAIN IDEA as expressed in the headline/subject title. > >>Was it adequate for a technically highly trained and obviously exposed to >>the world around person like yourself? > >Maybe it was. If it was, we >might have attempted to explain why it was. >That, I would submit,would >have been a more productive endeavor. > >That also could have put me in >my place for asking outrageous and/or >otherwise embarassing questions, >exposing my ignorant, anti-Indian >tendencies. > > > > > >I never >address any of my informational type posts to you and would prefer > >you >not > >comment on them. my posts are meant for the more serious posters >here. > > >*** Now, now! We don't need to get THAT protective of a >newspaper report do >we? It was hardly out of the ordinary bit of >incisive desi-reporting, >heh-heh. Nobody was accusing Deepjyoti of >either malfeasance or propaganda. >The only negative connotation might >have been in being perceived as >gullible or simple minded. Nothing to >get so worked up about, to take it >personally. More so since it is not >an incurable condition. All it takes is >shedding some hindu-nationalism >baggage to become able to see things more >clearly. > > > >cm :-) > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >At 5:31 PM +0530 9/26/03, >deepjyoti kakati wrote: > >>So when you crow about all of it done in 9 >hours, WITHOUT telling of the > >>details, the size and complexity of the >tasks involved, the story means > >>very little. > > > >CM even if the >article had mentioned the bridges being 1 km long each , you > >would say >> > > >1. it was a election publicity stunt by govt > >2. no minorities >were given chance to be labour > >3. its all a fake, everything from >india is a fake > >4. its a conspiracy against assam (as usual) > >5. >why 140 yr old bridge was there in first place > >6. has anyone done a >audit of cost incurred > >7. its delhis fault! (as usual) > >8. it >proves india is a sectarian country > >9. St. louis under your guidance >did a 10km bridge in 2 hrs. > >10. incite a tangential flamewar to hide >the original issue > > > >I never address any of my informational type >posts to you and would prefer > >you not > >comment on them. my posts >are meant for the more serious posters here. > > > >thanks for your >consideration. > > > >>_________________________________________________________________ > >>Instant message with integrated webcam using MSN Messenger 6.0. Try it >now > >FREE! http://msnmessenger-download.com > > > >>_______________________________________________ > >Assam mailing list > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/listinfo/assam > > > >>_______________________________________________ >Assam mailing list >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/listinfo/assam > <http://g.msn.com/8HMBENUS/2752??PS=>Get McAfee virus scanning and >cleaning of incoming attachments. Get Hotmail Extra Storage! >_______________________________________________ Assam mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/listinfo/assam _______________________________________________ Assam mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/listinfo/assam
