Thanks Rajib, that was a pretty good explantion. I was discussing about this a few days ago with a right-leaning friend of mine, and he kept pointing out that Bush has allowed some 70 odd existing lines of stem cells. And that these were 'more than enough' for any future research. These were inexhaustible and as such embryonic cells were unnecessary.
So, (you may know this) what are these 'lines'? I agree that stem cells should not have been an issue at all. And yes, it is surprising how the most advanced country in the world could be held ransom to to such levels of ignorance. >embryonic stem cells are UNDIFFERENTIATED cells that >are not adult cells but can grow into any - in other >words, they are not yet a human being that can be >killed. Moreover, one source for most cells for >research are SURPLUS embryos donated with specific >consent in situations such as invitro fertilization >when these cells are felt no longer required. In >other words, these would, in any case, have been >thrown away. --- Rajib Das <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > As far as I understand, and I am a layman, embryonic > stem cells are UNDIFFERENTIATED cells that are not > adult cells but can grow into any - in other words, > they are not yet a human being that can be killed. > Moreover, one source for most cells for research are > SURPLUS embryos donated with specific consent in > situations such as invitro fertilization when these > cells are felt no longer required. In other words, > these would, in any case, have been thrown away. > > Obviously it is felt that these embryonic stem cells > are important for discovering cures for many > diseases > such as Parkinsons etc. > > A stem cell, as per fundamentalist Christians, is > the > equivalent of an unborn baby. Since there are tonnes > of such types in the current administration (or it > finds tonnes of supporters), the administration has > the position that embryonic stem cell research > should > be banned. Never mind the fact that the embryonic > stem > cell is not yet an adult cell and that the supply > comes from sources where such cells would have been > destroyed anyway. > > I am flabbergasted this issue finds ANY space in > political debate let alone a central space. That too > in a developed country, that supposedly has > universal, > secular adult education. I believe Western Europe > (another Christian region) has no such compunctions. > My cousin was in Israel involved in Stem Cell > Research > - so I assume the Jews don't have much of an > objection > either. India has no problems on this account so the > Hindus don't object too. The Arabs, I am not too > sure, > are aware of stem cell research :-). So it is here, > the new bible belt, that such issues find any > credence. > > > > > > > > --- Tilok Hatimuria <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > O'Ram da: > > > > Aapuni thikei koise. Hema tu xosai poetic. Gotike > > cell-gila daam thoka bostu > > hoboi. > > > > > > >Also, should ethics even be an issue when > > >hESCs are drawn from frozen embryos? > > > > > > Yes, yes. Indeed ethics are of importance. Only > > problem is with the question > > of what is more ethical? Is it more ethical to > > declare war on a country not > > at war with us, on false pretenses, or is it more > > ethical to prohibit > > destruction of fertilized human embryos to harvest > > Hemar poetic cells? Is it > > more ethical to prevent playing God or saving > lives > > with embryonic stem > > cells or is it more ethical to go kill innocent > men, > > women and children > > along with all those that are branded 'terrorists' > - > > never mind if they > > really are or not. Is it more ethical to gloat > over > > shock-and-awe over > > destruction of the innocent with the guilty while > > expressing shock over > > Godless scientists working on embryonic stem > cells? > > > > These are complicated issues. Hypocrisy of course > is > > not something that one > > needs to bother with. Certainly not so, when with > > one neat label of > > "terrorists" we can cleanse our consciences of all > > guilt at snuffing out the > > innocent with the guilty, or those seen ming to be > > guilty. > > > > Looks like the label has really caught on. Even > back > > in the old country, > > poets and policemen, generals and governors, goons > > and the gentry, all are > > getting into the red-hot business of terrorist > > labeling, defining and > > hunting business with a vengeance. > > > > Nothing like a good tide to wash-off all the dirt > > around us, isn't it? > > > > > > > > Yours truly, > > > > Tilok Daktor(in a bad mood) > > > > > > > > The debate on stem cells has become an important > > issue > > in the Presidential campaign , the last debate, > and > > the passing away of Chris Reeves. > > > > While most of us have a basic understanding of > SCs, > > and the Nat'l Institutes of Health in its website > > does > > answer most of the questions, one keeps wondering > > why > > the President is so opposed to something most > > scientists would agree its a good thing for a > mirade > > of cures. > > > > My understanding is that human embryonic stem > cells > > (hESC) are the way to go. It seems that adult stem > > cells ie. hematopoietic stem cells,(HSCs) are the > > only > > ones available for research and hESCs research > > potential is stunted. Is the President just > > pandering > > to the religious right? > > > > Maybe some netter (or genetist) with a better > > understanding can give us in layman terms what all > > this means. Also, should ethics even be an issue > > when > > hESCs are drawn from frozen embryos? > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > Don�t just search. Find. Check out the new MSN > > Search! > > > http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/ > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Assam mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/listinfo/assam > > > > Mailing list FAQ: > > http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/assam/assam-faq.html > > To unsubscribe or change options: > > http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/options/assam > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam > protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > _______________________________________________ > Assam mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/listinfo/assam > > Mailing list FAQ: > http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/assam/assam-faq.html > To unsubscribe or change options: > http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/options/assam > _______________________________________________ Assam mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/listinfo/assam Mailing list FAQ: http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/assam/assam-faq.html To unsubscribe or change options: http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/options/assam
