Umesh, There problem is not so much as getting the best NGO to organize something like this, but whichever one that does organize should do so sincerely. This particular NGO seemed to lack organization, coordination, and plus they seemed to be patronizing.
> How do you think Delhi based NGOs treat poor, illiterate Rajasthan? I can take a gander - they probably treat groups from Rajasthan or from some other state with similar slights. Delhi based NGOs must obviously realize that at this rate they will loose all credibility. Yes, there may some genuine ones, but they would all be clubbed together. --Ram da On 5/16/05, umesh sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I keep reading about bihu taking Delhi by storm and being celebrated inside > Mothers International School, Aurobindo Ashram -- it IS the best school in > India -as per Outlook - as their mail said. So why not the Assamese in Delhi > take up this mission to connect the NE creative writers with Delhi's > academia. There are many students in delhi colleges also from Assam and rest > of NE - why not they take up the constructive task. > > How do you think Delhi based NGOs treat poor, illiterate Rajasthan? > > Umesh > > > Ram Sarangapani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Incidents like these give NGOs a bad name. Moreover, there seems to > some patronizing attitude toward the NE by Delhites. This is just > shameful! > If they were organizing events of this nature, they ought to do their > homework. > > --Ram > __________ > > Issue Date: Tuesday, May 17, 2005 > Help! We are from the N-E > SHILLONG NOTES / PATRICIA MUKHIM > It has become fashionable for sundry organisations based in New Delhi > to do something for the people of the Northeast. It almost seems as if > the natives are such a helpless lot that they are incapable of doing > anything for themselves. > > Recently, a New Delhi-based non-governmental organisation (NGO), > claiming to be a publishing house and a non-profit organisation, > invited creative writers from the region for a three-day meeting. Two > prestigious schools, the Assam Valley School and Maria's Public > Schools, were also included among the invitees. The schools responded > in the hope that they would have a wonderful opportunity to interface > with other students from equally prestigious schools in Delhi. They > were deeply disappointed as the school that participated was not what > they expected it would be and they learnt nothing from the interface. > > Assam and Manipur had a big contingent of creative writers, artists, > filmmakers, theatre personalities and journalists attending the > function. Meghalaya, Arunachal Pradesh and Nagaland had one > representative each. Prior to the event, the organisation had hyped > things up so much that several sponsors and donors agreed to pool > funds towards the projected expenditure for the three-day event. > Sponsors included DoNER, ONGC, the Union culture ministry and the > North Eastern Council (NEC). So keen were the organisers to make the > event a high-profile one that they also invited two mediapersons, one > each from Meghalaya and Manipur. > > Those who responded to the call did so with the expectation that the > event would bring them face to face with policy planners and other > reputed writers of the capital. Nothing of the sort happened. Except > for a few members belonging to the organisation and New Delhi-based > students from the Northeast, there was hardly anyone from Delhi. > > So, in retrospect, this was another of those vain attempts to > ostensibly flag critical issues of the region to a Delhi audience, > except that it turned out that almost all of the speakers in the panel > and also in the audience were people from the Northeast. Yet again, > people from the region are talking to themselves, about themselves and > for themselves. It just did not make any sense at all. We could have > had a similar gathering at any of the capital cities of the region at > very little cost. And we would not have required a New Delhi-based > organisation to do the planning for us. We could have done that > ourselves. > > For an event of that stature, one would have expected the metro media > to be attending in full strength. But that, too, was missing. The > event received little or no coverage at all. On the whole, the episode > was a big letdown. Things turned out to be even more nightmarish when > the organisation refused outright to refund the airfares of > participants they had specifically invited to be on different panels. > In fact, the entire event was so badly organised that people had to be > suddenly pulled out from among the audience to become panellists for > sessions they were ill-prepared for. > > P.A. Sangma was asked to come for a session that was to start at 10 > am. He arrived on the dot and sat through the session that he was a > panellist of, giving an incisive over-view of the Centre's perception > of the Northeast, which was well taken by the audience. > > After the two-hour session, Sangma took leave because he had a > Parliament session to attend. Without taking cognisance of the MP's > hectic schedule and his more important duty of sitting in Parliament, > the organisers suddenly announced that Sangma would also chair an > afternoon session where school students would engage in a mock > parliament. Sangma was taken aback! He was not told of this > arrangement, he said. And he could not justifiably remain absent from > Parliament for the whole day. This blatant disrespect for protocol and > the propensity to take for granted anyone who is from the Northeast > was amply demonstrated by the organisers, showing yet again what scant > respect the mainstream really has even for political stalwarts from > the Northeast. > > Another session, which was supposed to be attended by about 40 people > from different universities of Delhi, also had a lukewarm response. > There were precisely eight people from Jawaharlal Nehru University and > Delhi University who attended. The rest were all northeasterners. > Those who came did so because they were previously connected to the > region. There were no curious or interested spectators who would have > wanted to learn something more from the panel discussions. > > The organisers made everyone believe they were actually hosting the > event on a shoestring budget. Hence, people were expected to rough it > out in a guesthouse with no air-conditioner, in the unbearable heat of > Delhi. > > They were asked to share a room that was just about 10x10 in size. > Food was literally rationed out, and it was purely vegetarian. > Northeasterners are supposed to put up with this kind of treatment in > the national capital because they cannot expect any better. The very > fact that people were invited to come to New Delhi was seen as a great > favour done to the untamed natives. So they had better not complain! > This ludicrous show has taught every invitee to the function a lesson. > > Unfortunately, the Union government, with its plethora of departments, > never learns from mistakes. The emergence of organisations like DoNER, > which are based in Delhi and seem to be flush with funds, has also > made them a happy hunting ground for organisations looking for easy > funding. DoNER seems ready to comply with anything that appears like a > remote attempt to "showcase the Northeast", as if the people here are > specimens to be dissected by the more evolved species of humans who > live in New Delhi. > > A report in a Meghalaya-based local newspaper on Sunday, May 15, said > DoNER would use the Indian Institute of Management (IIM), Lucknow, to > evaluate and monitor projects in the Northeast. Now why on earth > should an organisation based in Lucknow do this work? > > The region has its own IIM at Guwahati in Assam, which is more than > competent to carry out such an exercise. But of course IIM, Guwahati, > may not have godfathers in DoNER, so they will not get any projects, > right? What IIM, Lucknow, will do is sub-contract the research and > investigation part to a local NGO and pay them a pittance. Is this an > ethical practice? When we speak of IIM, Lucknow, we are actually > speaking of one faculty member from that institute who probably has > "friends" in DoNER. Should we in the Northeast remain passive > recipients of crumbs from DoNER? Is it not high time that we raise our > voices of protest against these attempts to short-change the region? > > Perhaps one of the flaws of people here is that they are > mild-mannered, polite and soft-spoken, a culture alien to Delhi. The > average Delhiite sees these attributes as signs of weakness. That is > the crux of the matter and it shall always stand in the way of people > understanding each other. Some people think they can make themselves > heard better by shouting. Northeasterners consider that to be the > height of crudity and a complete absence of civilised behaviour. > > However, politeness does not mean allowing people to take you for > granted. People of the region need to unitedly chart out a masterplan > on how to prevent Delhi-based organisations who profess to do charity > for the Northeast from taking away funds meant for the genuine > development of human resources in the region. > > _______________________________________________ > Assam mailing list > Assam@pikespeak.uccs.edu > http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/listinfo/assam > > Mailing list FAQ: > http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/assam/assam-faq.html > To unsubscribe or change options: > http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/options/assam > > > ________________________________ > Yahoo! Messenger - want a free & easy way to contact your friends online? > > _______________________________________________ Assam mailing list Assam@pikespeak.uccs.edu http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/listinfo/assam Mailing list FAQ: http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/assam/assam-faq.html To unsubscribe or change options: http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/options/assam
