Hi C'da:
Aapunar siro-porisito aao-paak loguwa kotha-khini porhi robo nuwarilu aaru. :)
>So you don't support MRG really, because she has insisted with the
>GoI that they OUGHT to discuss the ULFA's central demand--that of
>sovereignty for Assam.
I don't remember reading anywhere that MRG "insisted with the GOI that they OUGHT to discuss the ULFA's central demand - the sovereignty for Assam", but read that the 'talk' between the two must take place, even if it includes the topic of Assam's sovereinty.
>From: Chan Mahanta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "Rajen Barua" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[email protected]>
>Subject: Re: [Assam] Correspondent, why avoid asking , No peace without Sovereignty restored?
>Date: Wed, 15 Jun 2005 10:58:59 -0500
>
>So you don't support MRG really, because she has insisted with the
>GoI that they OUGHT to discuss the ULFA's central demand--that of
>sovereignty for Assam.
>
>But you cannot say that, and instead indulge in semantics,
>attempting to have it both ways.
>
>You sure have made a very impressive stand here Rajen--one of
>principled courage :-)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>At 10:57 AM -0500 6/15/05, Rajen Barua wrote:
>>No I don't think I am changing the context. :
>>When MRG says:
>>
>>"I am sympathetic to the causes the ULFA have been fighting
>>>>for the past 25 years. Whether they would get a sovereign state
>>>>or
>>>>not is a different matter, but it should be discussed at the
>>>>negotiating table."
>>
>>she does not seem to mean ULFA should have the RIGHT to bring the
>>topic to the negotiating table.
>>
>>If MRG clarifies otherwise that she meant her statement to say ULFA
>>should have the RIGHT, I will withdraw my support (not that my
>>support cares).
>>In the last news report I found added evidence for my continued
>>support for her action.
>>That is the issue.
>>Rajen
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Chan Mahanta
>>To: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Rajen Barua ;
>><mailto:[email protected]>[email protected]
>>Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2005 10:00 AM
>>Subject: Re: [Assam] Correspondent, why avoid asking , No peace
>>without Sovereignty restored?
>>
>>Rajen:
>>
>>
>>You have changed the contexts around : The one in which I asked
>>you the question, and the one in which I made my comment.
>>
>>But That is fine. I can see the your need for doing that :-).
>>
>>However, you wrote:
>>
>>> But my support to MRG was based on my understanding that she was
>>>just trying to bring peace without actually believeing in ULFA's
>>>misson or goal.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>and
>>
>> >You are trying to show that MRG is taking a position that ULFA
>>should have a RIGHT, which I >don't find anywhere, and definitely
>>not in her words in this report.
>>
>>
>>*** But look at the highlighted part of the previous Sentinel
>>interview with MRG below.
>>
>>Whast do you make of that?
>>
>>I asked you that before. The last time you commented that we have
>>to be careful an bout these newspaper reports. You implied that it
>>was not reliable enough to draw conclusions from.
>>
>>However you have found it convenient to use this recent interview,
>>from the same paper more reliable .
>>
>>That is your choice. You are entitled to cherry pick what suits
>>your particular need on a particular day.
>>
>>But that does not add any credibility to your commentary, does it
>>:-)?
>>
>>c
>>
>>
>_______________________________________________
>Assam mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/listinfo/assam
>
>Mailing list FAQ:
>http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/assam/assam-faq.html
>To unsubscribe or change options:
>http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/options/assam
_______________________________________________ Assam mailing list [email protected] http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/listinfo/assam
Mailing list FAQ: http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/assam/assam-faq.html To unsubscribe or change options: http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/options/assam
