"If a movement shies away from testing its own legitimacy, it becomesmerely 
self-serving. Its own claims to be fighting for justice, or forthe rights of 
the people, simply become self-confirming assumptions,with no accountability to 
anyone. " IE
Really, very little else need to be said about insurgent groups in the country
--Ram__________________________________ Test of democracy The prime minister 
has thrown a challenge to Naxalite groups An important question about the 
legitimacy of the Naxal movement hasbeen raised by Prime Minister Manmohan 
Singh. He has punctured thebasic pretension that Naxalites in this country have 
long held, thattheirs is a popular movement. He has asked them to prove 
theirpopularity by joining the electoral process and not through violentand 
intimidating acts. In doing so, the prime minister has also drawnattention to a 
paradox that lies at the heart of so many violentmovements which claim to 
represent the people. These movements can doeverything but face the people in 
an open contest.
The political process is often full of shortcomings, and does notunambiguously 
express the will of the people. But it does not followfrom this fact that any 
group can claim the mantle of representing thepeople, their needs and 
aspirations, simply by trumpeting loudly thatthey are fighting for the people. 
Even if the grievances that theNaxals draw upon truly exist, their means, 
methods and policies needto be subject to some test to ascertain their 
legitimacy. For all itsinfirmities, electoral democracy is one of the few means 
ofadjudicating any claims to represent the people. If a movement shiesaway from 
testing its own legitimacy, it becomes merely self-serving.Its own claims to be 
fighting for justice, or for the rights of thepeople, simply become 
self-confirming assumptions, with noaccountability to anyone.
The prime minister is challenging a movement, that claims to befighting for 
justice, to subject itself to the test of democracy. Indoing so, he is also 
displaying great confidence in an open politicalprocess, by suggesting that the 
media should be allowed to interactwith any political group. But no democracy 
can and ought to tolerateits own subversion. The subversion is all the more 
insidious when donein the name of the people. Participating in the democratic 
processcomes with some unavoidable conditions. It requires abjuring violence,it 
requires respecting the integrity of a political process. The primeminister's 
call to the Naxals, therefore, is both a warning that theyhave to give up 
violence, and a challenge to them to prove what theyclaim for themselves — 
popular support.  

URL: http://www.indianexpress.com/full_story.php?content_id=76768
_______________________________________________
Assam mailing list
Assam@pikespeak.uccs.edu
http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/listinfo/assam

Mailing list FAQ:
http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/assam/assam-faq.html
To unsubscribe or change options:
http://pikespeak.uccs.edu/mailman/options/assam

Reply via email to