On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 08:26:28 -0500, McKown, John wrote: >THEPROG CSECT > STM 14,12,12(13) > LR 12,15 > USING THEPROG,12,11,10 > LAY 11,4096(,12) > LAY 10,4096(,11)
I realize that the STM implies that the program is not in 64-bit mode, but a better sequence would be: LA 12,0(,15) LAY 11,4096(,15) LAY 10,4096*2(,15) LA is better than LR because it works in any addressing mode and clears the non-address bits. Also if R12 is used immediately as a base register, LA provides the result to the pipeline faster than LR. And basing the LAY instructions off of R15 instead of R12 eliminates the pipeline stalls caused by each instruction being dependent on the prior. David