Please, please don't succumb to the C people.  Don't allow them to make 
Assembler look like C, or far, far worse, like C++.  This comment about adding 
the :: looks a %^&^*-load like a C++ operator.  PLEASE, don't let the people 
who are crummy C programmers force you to conform to THEIR conventions just 
because they don't want to learn assembler.

--- On Wed, 10/27/10, Automatic digest processor <lists...@listserv.uga.edu> 
wrote:


From: Automatic digest processor <lists...@listserv.uga.edu>
Subject: ASSEMBLER-LIST Digest - 26 Oct 2010 to 27 Oct 2010 (#2010-215)
To: "Recipients of ASSEMBLER-LIST digests" <ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU>
Date: Wednesday, October 27, 2010, 11:11 PM











 



ASSEMBLER-LIST Digest - 26 Oct 2010 to 27 Oct 2010 (#2010-215)

Table of contents:

Opcode tables (10) 
Thoughts on "enhancements" to HLASM or other z assembler (5) 
Opcode Tables and Search Order 
=?windows-1256?Q?re:_Though?= =?windows-1256?Q?ts_on_"enh?= 
=?windows-1256?Q?ancements"?= =?windows-1256?Q?_to_HLASM_?= 
=?windows-1256?Q?or_other_z?= =?windows-1256?Q?_assembler?= 
=?windows-1256?Q?=FE?= 
=?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Thoughts_on_=22enhancements=22_to_HLASM_or_other_z_a?= 
=?UTF-8?Q?ssembler=E2=80=8F?= 

Opcode tables

Re: Opcode tables (10/27)
From: Peter Relson <rel...@us.ibm.com> 
Re: Opcode tables (10/27)
From: Tom Marchant <m42tom-ibmm...@yahoo.com> 
Re: Opcode tables (10/27)
From: Tom Marchant <m42tom-ibmm...@yahoo.com> 
Re: Opcode tables (10/27)
From: Binyamin Dissen <bdis...@dissensoftware.com> 
Re: Opcode tables (10/27)
From: Paul Gilmartin <paulgboul...@aim.com> 
Re: Opcode tables (10/27)
From: David Bond <david-b...@comcast.net> 
Re: Opcode tables (10/27)
From: Paul Gilmartin <paulgboul...@aim.com> 
Re: Opcode tables (10/27)
From: David Bond <david-b...@comcast.net> 
Re: Opcode tables (10/27)
From: Tom Marchant <m42tom-ibmm...@yahoo.com> 
Re: Opcode tables (10/27)
From: David Bond <david-b...@comcast.net>
Thoughts on "enhancements" to HLASM or other z assembler

Thoughts on "enhancements" to HLASM or other z assembler (10/27)
From: "McKown, John" <john.mck...@healthmarkets.com> 
Re: Thoughts on "enhancements" to HLASM or other z assembler (10/27)
From: John Ehrman <ehr...@us.ibm.com> 
Re: Thoughts on "enhancements" to HLASM or other z assembler (10/27)
From: Mark Hammack <mark.hamm...@gmail.com> 
Re: Thoughts on "enhancements" to HLASM or other z assembler (10/27)
From: "John R. Ehrman (408-463-3543 T/543-)" <ehr...@stlvm27.vnet.ibm.com> 
Re: Thoughts on "enhancements" to HLASM or other z assembler (10/27)
From: Tony Harminc <t...@harminc.com>
Opcode Tables and Search Order

Opcode Tables and Search Order (10/27)
From: John Ehrman <ehr...@us.ibm.com>
=?windows-1256?Q?re:_Though?= =?windows-1256?Q?ts_on_"enh?= 
=?windows-1256?Q?ancements"?= =?windows-1256?Q?_to_HLASM_?= 
=?windows-1256?Q?or_other_z?= =?windows-1256?Q?_assembler?= 
=?windows-1256?Q?=FE?=

=?windows-1256?Q?re:_Though?= =?windows-1256?Q?ts_on_"enh?= 
=?windows-1256?Q?ancements"?= =?windows-1256?Q?_to_HLASM_?= 
=?windows-1256?Q?or_other_z?= =?windows-1256?Q?_assembler?= 
=?windows-1256?Q?=FE?= (10/27)
From: john gilmore <john_w_gilm...@msn.com>
=?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Thoughts_on_=22enhancements=22_to_HLASM_or_other_z_a?= 
=?UTF-8?Q?ssembler=E2=80=8F?=

=?UTF-8?Q?Re=3A_Thoughts_on_=22enhancements=22_to_HLASM_or_other_z_a?= 
=?UTF-8?Q?ssembler=E2=80=8F?= (10/27)
From: Mark Hammack <mark.hamm...@gmail.com>


 Browse the ASSEMBLER-LIST online archives. 



Reply via email to