Yes, indeed. I should have proofed my post. Still, the substance of what I wanted to say is not much affected by the fact that 'SR' should have been 'SM'.
On 2/10/12, John P Kalinich <jkali...@csc.com> wrote: > John Gilmore of the IBM Mainframe Assembler List > <ASSEMBLER-LIST@listserv.uga.edu> wrote on 02/10/2012 07:52:18 AM: > >> Comments are or, better, should be of two sorts: >> >> 1) Substantial prefixed blocks of text, often several hundred lines of >> them, that describe what will be done and how it will be done, and >> explicate coding conventions for parameters, and >> >> 2) comments following single instructions, 'remarks'. >> >> A comment like 'store registers' attached to an SR instruction is worse > than useless. > > Agree, since SR is 'subtract' not 'store'. > > Regards, > John K > -- John Gilmore, Ashland, MA 01721 - USA
