>>I'll write my stand-alone apps as stand-alone apps. For what? Android is also Google. And non-corporations like Samsung, HTC, Motorola (oops, Google again). iPhone is Apple of course (and Objective C?) Windows Phone? Haha, and Microsoft? Is MS Ok here? You're against them too, I guess? Yes, well, makers of IE. Not so Java, either (C# beats Java all ways, btw). Ok. Most stuff ends up in a browser anyway, nowadays. And Windows 8 PC/Surface/Windows Phone 7 could become a big market for HTML5 apps. /not so serious
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] Im Auftrag von Shane G Gesendet: Samstag, 14. Juli 2012 16:08 An: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU Betreff: Re: (OT) Open Mobile On Sat, Jul 14th, 2012 at 10:53 PM, Steve Comstock wrote: > > For my money HTML5 and evolutions thereof is a better use of learning > > effort than java. And it's not terribly difficult. > > Totally agree. Hmmm - presuming you want to be browser constrained. IE is rubbish, F/F is a pig, Chrome is part of the corporate vacuum black hole that is Google - anything (in any sense) from Apple is anathema. I know, I know - I'm fighting smoke. But for now, I'll write my stand-alone apps as stand-alone apps. Shane ...
