“Keep in mind that UNPK swaps bits 0-3 of the right byte with
bits 4-7.”
That’s why the Or Immediate is there; it enforces a zone nibble of 0xF for the
last hex digit and ensures correct execution of the TRanslate.
On Thu, Apr 12, 2018 at 3:00 PM -0500, "Seymour J Metz" <sme...@gmu.edu> wrote:
Keep in mind that UNPK swaps bits 0-3 of the right byte with bits 4-7.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3
________________________________________
From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List on behalf of Keven
Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 4:15 PM
To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@listserv.uga.edu
Subject: Re: SDWA - SDWACMPC conversion
Good point; I should have stuck with HEXTBL-240 but I decided
last minute that hexadecimal notation would make for a better aesthetic and for
some reason X’C0’ stepped forward instead of the apposite value.
Using the UNPK/OI does mean no reading past the last byte of the value to be
converted which may be desirable for a generalized implementation.
Keven
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 9:22 AM -0500, "J R" wrote:
As you're concerned with robustness, it might be better to address the
translate table thus:
TR ZONED,HEXTBL-X'F0' X'C1C2C3'
> On Apr 5, 2018, at 18:29, Keven wrote:
>
> TR ZONED,HEXTBL-X'C0' X'C1C2C3'
