Indeed... but, J. Scott's technique is actually different (and at least to me interesting). It also has the benefit of being actual working code.
btw, my suggested "improvement" isn't complete; another OI is needed for the next-to-last byte of &target. And if you're paranoid about the possibility of it being used in sub-240 byte routines, then sure, my changes won't do. On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 10:54 PM, Paul Gilmartin < 00000014e0e4a59b-dmarc-requ...@listserv.uga.edu> wrote: > On 2018-04-16, at 20:48:39, Charles Mills wrote: > > > Good grief! How many experienced z assembler programmers does it take to > convert 12 bits of binary to hex? > > > Errr... One to write the code and twenty to prate about it on > ASSEMBLER-LIST? > > --gil > -- sas
