If IBM accepts an RFE for SYNADAF to provide dsname,  member and path, they 
will need to do so in a fashion that does not break existing code. That means 
that the callers will still need new code to exploit it.

Long messages don't bother me.

No, a one line primary and an optional one line secondary is all the SYNADAF 
currently provides.


--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
http://mason.gmu.edu/~smetz3

________________________________________
From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List <[email protected]> on behalf 
of Paul Gilmartin <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2019 3:52 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Lousy error from HLASM in USS

On 2019-04-14, at 12:52:27, Seymour J Metz wrote:

> I approve of using the message text from SYNADAF, but Shirley it would be 
> reasonable to include dsname, member and path
>
SYNADAF should do that, not its caller.

Various IBM docs specify PATH_MAX as 1023.  That could result in long messages.

> ..., when relevant. Also, does ASMA999U include the secondary message from 
> SYNADAF when the primary message buffer ends in "S"?
>
If the message should be so long, can the secondary message end
in "S" to indicate a tertiary message, etc.

> The HLASM Programmer's Guide should have a reference to, e.g., z/OS DFSMS 
> Macro Instructions for Data Sets for the format of the SYNADAF data.
>
Thanks.  Lots for the OP to RTFM.

-- gil

Reply via email to