On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 10:13:22 +0100, Jonathan Scott wrote: >The SYNADAF information returned by the access method is all >HLASM knows about the error.
Not exactly. In the OP's case, HLASM knows what macro it was processing. >To produce a more "intelligent" >message HLASM would have to parse the SYNADAF information itself, >which would be complex and error-prone yet provide very limited >value. The "parsing" is much more trivial than what you are suggesting. Specifically, "WRNG.LEN.RECORD" is in the Error Description that is from offset 91 through offset 105 of the SYNADAF message area. Picking out that information is neither complex nor error-prone. -- Tom Marchant
