Maybe the system put the TIOT entry in the extended TIOT. Look up EXTRACT and GETDSAB macros.
Chris Blaicher Technical Architect Syncsort, Inc. -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] On Behalf Of retired mainframer Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2019 11:42 AM To: MVS List Server 2 <ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU> Subject: Re: old code failing Can you show us the code that does the looking? > -----Original Message----- > From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List <ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU> > On Behalf Of Richard Kuebbing > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2019 8:24 AM > To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU > Subject: old code failing > > A subroutine written long ago appears to be failing. It looks for a > DDname in the TIOT. Did the format of the TIOT change at some point? If > yes, at what release? > > Does it matter if AMODE is 24 or 31? > > It might have something to do with the fact that the DD is a proc > override instead of straight JCL or in a proc.
