I run 60x160 (3279 emulation) -- and on a 14-inch laptop. No problems -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [mailto:ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] On Behalf Of Farley, Peter Sent: Friday, 18 November 2022 19:27 To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU Subject: Re: ASMA500 message question
Why aren't you using a custom size like 50x160? I use that every day, in both PCOMM and Vista TN3270. Mod-5 size is far too small in my opinion -- only 27x132. I hated the few times I tried to use x3270/wx3270 - totally unintuitive. Peter -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List <ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU> On Behalf Of Schmitt, Michael Sent: Friday, November 18, 2022 12:04 PM To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU Subject: Re: ASMA500 message question I can say that I don't use GOFF because it requires LIST(133), which would be OK except that we run the assembler listings through a program that adds cross-reference statement numbers to the right side of the listing, which increases the listing line size. LIST(121) listings are expanded to 133, which is fine. But GOFF listings are expanded to LRECL=145, which no longer fits in a mod 5 terminal. "Every change breaks someone's workflow" -----Original Message----- From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List <ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU> On Behalf Of Seymour J Metz Sent: Friday, November 18, 2022 8:32 AM To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU Subject: Re: ASMA500 message question What is your objection to GOFF and XOBJECT? -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://clicktime.symantec.com/15uBY2YmhLrGypjCP f7sX?h=TlrVj6e-jXwm-DUGUoG9J8qy4NZMCDyk1ySgazBSF1Q=&u=http:**Amason.gmu.edu* *Asmetz3__;Ly8vfg!!Ebr-cpPeAnfNniQ8HSAI-g_K5b7VKg!KJRnahT7X_S-BXawy0OmrVSouS S3D2vT5awUcmf0051xXsLtd0-OujJ4IzC82YTiuxxjzjO5zzWA0B7Qp5jSe0czWi3eels$ ________________________________________ From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List [ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU] on behalf of Mike Shaw [quick...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2022 4:03 PM To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU Subject: Re: ASMA500 message question CATTR use requires GOFF object format, which I don't want to use. Mike On Thu, Nov 17, 2022 at 3:31 PM Seymour J Metz <sme...@gmu.edu> wrote: > You need a CATTR with the proper alignment. > > ________________________________________ > From: IBM Mainframe Assembler List <ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU> > on behalf of Mike Shaw <techsupp...@quickref.com> > Sent: Thursday, November 17, 2022 3:20 PM > To: ASSEMBLER-LIST@LISTSERV.UGA.EDU > Subject: ASMA500 message question > > Everyone, > > This code fragment: > > 00001C 4700 0000 00000 71 NOP 0 > 000020 0101 72 PR > 000022 73 DC 0LQ > *** ASMA500W Requested alignment exceeds section alignment * > 000022 74 QUAD@1 DC LQ'0' > > causes the *ASMA500W* message to be issued; it's description appears below: > > * ASMA500W Requested alignment exceeds section alignment > > Explanation: The section alignment is lower than that requested on > the instruction and hence the actual alignment may not be honored. > > System Action: The requested alignment is ignored. > > Programmer Response: Change the requested alignment to be less than > or equal to that of the section, or ensure that the desired alignment > is achieved during program linking and loading. > * > * Severity: 4 * > > Does anyone know what the 'section' mentioned in the message is? Is it > a reference to the current control section (CSECT)? > > I don't get it...all I want to do is get quadword boundary alignment > for the QUAD@1 constant. > > Mike Shaw > MVS/QuickRef Support Group > Chicago-Soft, Ltd. > This message and any attachments are intended only for the use of the addressee and may contain information that is privileged and confidential. If the reader of the message is not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the message and any attachments from your system. -- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. www.avast.com
