On 12/20/23 12:58:41, Seymour J Metz wrote:
Why not
MACRO
...
&SYSECT &SYSSTYP
&SYSLOC LOCTR
MEND
.
Doesn't &SYSLOC LOCTR imply &SYSECT &SYSSTYP? I don't believe
it creates a duplicate-named location counter in a different section.
Is there an RFE for PUSH CSECT, PUSH DSECT or PUSH LOCTR?
.
I think Tony's suggestion covers the meager use case.
________________________________________
From: Tony Harminc
Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2023 2:46 PM>
MACRO
...
&N SETC '&SYSECT'
&T SETC '&SYSSTYP'
BLAH DSECT
...
&N &T
MEND
is common enough in our code. I can't say I've tried it, but presumably it
would work with an unnamed xSECT.
--
gil
