> On 1/31/2008, Dirk Kulmsee ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > Shouldn't the NoProcessingList take precedence over > > LocalAddresses_Flat (over anything else in fact)? > > Of course not. > > The NoProcessingList is NOT the list of valid recipients. Two totally > different things. > > It is up to the Admin to make sure that a complete list of valid > recipients is available to ASSP. > > The question you shoul dbe asking yourself if, why would you want to > have a recipient in the NoProcessingList and NOT in the > LocalAddresses_Flat?
My thought was to close down access to the mailbox server as much as possible so that nobody will pour in spam although this server is not an MX. So all incoming mail should go through the ASSP server first. But there are domains, that I only forward (e.g. I am 2nd MX). I don't have the recipient list for these. I assumed I could let the mail for these domains also go through the ASSP system, but not filter them (i. e. NoProcessing). Unfortunately the NoProcessingList appears to be a SomeProcessingList ;-) I worked around the problem by putting "@domain" in LocalAddresses_Flat for these recipients. I should probably redesign the mail flow so that ASSP and a MTA work side by side on that machine. Then mail that is not to be filtered can have its path through the same system, but not through ASSP. Thanks for your help! Regards Dirk Kulmsee ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
