You can definitely get away with one thread. I receive 51,000 emails
per day with a load average of 20%, working on one thread(1.3.9)
Paul K. Dickson
Systems Administrator
Frederick County Government, IIT
301-600-2399/x12399
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 4:09 PM
To: ASSP development mailing list
Subject: Re: [Assp-test] ASSP 2.0 requires 500mb ram by default?
Here are my ASSP stats. I figure that I'm on the low end of the
spectrum, so I think I might be able to get away with only one or two
worker threads. The 64 days figure is misleading, since a recent update
accidentally overwrote the stats sav file. It's closer to the turn of
1.5 years.
ASSP Proxy Uptime:
5 days 16 hours 26 mins 54 secs
64 days 10 hours 46 mins
Messages Processed:
8240 (1449.3 per day)
114624 (1778.5 per day)
Non-Local Mail Blocked:
87.5%
89.8%
CPU Usage:
0.10% (1.67% avg)
2.39% avg
Concurrent SMTP Sessions:
0 (5 max)
15 max
.
Dickson, Paul wrote:
Seems to me your mail flow doesn't warrant a bunch of threads, if even
multiple threads, so it should be a non-issue.
Paul K. Dickson
Systems Administrator
Frederick County Government, IIT
301-600-2399/x12399
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin
Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2008 1:09 PM
To: ASSP development mailing list
Subject: Re: [Assp-test] ASSP 2.0 requires 500mb ram by default?
Fritz Borgstedt wrote:
Stick with the 1.x series if you don't need the
threading.
There are a lot of other features in ASSP 2 besides threading.
My recommendation is to put the number of communication threads
to 1
if you do not need the extra performance..
Even with number of communication threads set to 1 the GUI
handling
has its own thread and makes ASSP much more responsive.
The DomainKey Check as it is implemented is working successful.
Results from Image/PDF scanning are encouraging.
There is rule driven mechanism for recipient replacements.
Transparent SSL Proxy support implemented.
We are now implementing global and local caches and global and
local
penaltybox files.
The memory usage increase is ridiculous though.
Why not spend some time profiling and optimizing that?
Kevin
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace.
It's the best place to buy or sell services for
just about anything Open Source.
http://sourceforge.net/services/buy/index.php
_______________________________________________
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
