|
I was not using the spamaddresses in that way so I was not sure. I made
a quick test: I set [EMAIL PROTECTED] in spamaddresses. notice that [EMAIL PROTECTED] is also in the valid-recipients file. These are the loglines I got. Sep-9-08 15:01:04 [EMAIL PROTECTED] matches [EMAIL PROTECTED] in spamaddresses Sep-9-08 15:01:04 [EMAIL PROTECTED] matches [EMAIL PROTECTED] in LocalAddresses_Flat Sep-9-08 15:01:04 [EMAIL PROTECTED] matches [EMAIL PROTECTED] in spamaddresses after that, the mail was collected and IP score was added to the ip address ================= Sep-9-08 15:01:04 ap-61664-02499 x.x.x.x <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PB-IP-Score for 'x.x.x.x' is 25, added 25 for SpamCollectAddress Sep-9-08 15:01:04 ap-61664-02499 [Collect] x.x.x.x <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [spam found] (Collect Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) [test] -> ./spam/2499.eml Sep-9-08 15:01:04 Disconnected: x.x.x.x ================= This is interesting though as ASSP sees that the address is in 'LocalAddresses', but still does the collection. A way to prevent this would be to declare the localrecipients file also in the noCollecting option. I just tested this in small scale and maybe found a bug: I am using ASSP 1.4.1.1.20 I put [EMAIL PROTECTED] into the spamaddresses field. I put [EMAIL PROTECTED] into the noCollecting field. Normally there should be no collection on this address but this is not what's happening here: (It looks like there is a second check on spamaddresses after the first part of checks, this also was strange in the above snippet of the log) ================= Sep-9-08 15:13:23 [EMAIL PROTECTED] matches matches [EMAIL PROTECTED] spamaddresses Sep-9-08 15:13:23 [EMAIL PROTECTED] matches [EMAIL PROTECTED] LocalAddresses_Flat Sep-9-08 15:13:23 [EMAIL PROTECTED] matches [EMAIL PROTECTED] noCollecting Sep-9-08 15:13:23 [EMAIL PROTECTED] matches [EMAIL PROTECTED] spamaddresses Sep-9-08 15:13:23 ap-62403-05730 x.x.x.x <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] for 'x.x.x.x' is 25, added 25 for SpamCollectAddress Sep-9-08 15:13:23 ap-62403-05730 [Collect] x.x.x.x <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [spam found] (Collect Address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) [test2] Sep-9-08 15:13:23 Disconnected: x.x.x.x ================= I think the development team should take a look at this. Best regards, Frank _larsneo_ wrote: Frank Mayer-2 wrote: |
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/
_______________________________________________ Assp-test mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
