I have seen several of these come in in the past (not just this sender):

Return-Path: <paym...@cenbank.org>
Received: from mymxserver.com ([unix socket])
         by mymxserver.com (Cyrus v2.3.8-OS X Server 10.5:      9G69) with 
LMTPA;
         Tue, 28 Jul 2009 14:32:48 -0400
X-Sieve: CMU Sieve 2.3
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by mymxserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AB13B16DA2
        for <u...@myvirtualdomain.com>; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 14:32:48 -0400 (EDT)
X-Quarantine-ID: <7pa9PF6Mj5nV>
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at myserver.com
Received: from mymxserver.com ([127.0.0.1])
        by localhost (mymxserver.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
        with ESMTP id 7pa9PF6Mj5nV for <u...@myvirtualdomain.com>;
        Tue, 28 Jul 2009 14:32:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mout3.freenet.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by mymxserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9868FB16D96
        for <u...@myvirtualdomain.com>; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 14:32:46 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from [195.4.92.15] (helo=5.mx.freenet.de)
        by mout3.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID ngt5...@justmail.de) (port 25)  
(Exim 4.69 #92)
        id 1MVTzj-0002vQ-JV; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 19:28:15 +0200
Received: from ml82.128.2.28.multilinks.com ([82.128.2.28]:3927  
helo=User)
        by 5.mx.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID ngt5...@justmail.de) (port 25)  
(Exim 4.69 #93)
        id 1MVTzg-0004nD-SO; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 19:28:15 +0200


My server names replaced to protect the guilty. ;-)

For some reason, these messages do not seem to be processed by assp,  
and go straight through to postfix. Presumably this:

Received: from mout3.freenet.de (localhost [127.0.0.1])
        by mymxserver.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9868FB16D96
        for <u...@myvirtualdomain.com>; Tue, 28 Jul 2009 14:32:46 -0400 (EDT)

is fooling some part of the chain. It does not mention the port, so  
I'm not sure how it gets to postfix. As far as I know, only the  
correct ports are open on the machine:

mine:~ me$ netstat -na | grep LIST
tcp4       0      0  66.96.20.5.2500        *.*                     
LISTEN
tcp4       0      0  66.96.20.5.465         *.*                     
LISTEN
tcp4       0      0  *.2500                 *.*                     
LISTEN
tcp4       0      0  127.0.0.1.465          *.*                     
LISTEN
tcp4       0      0  66.96.20.5.587         *.*                     
LISTEN
tcp4       0      0  66.96.20.5.25          *.*                     
LISTEN
tcp4       0      0  *.995                  *.*                     
LISTEN
tcp4       0      0  *.110                  *.*                     
LISTEN
tcp4       0      0  *.993                  *.*                     
LISTEN
tcp4       0      0  *.143                  *.*                     
LISTEN
tcp4       0      0  127.0.0.1.10025        *.*                     
LISTEN
tcp4       0      0  *.2600                 *.*                     
LISTEN
tcp4       0      0  *.125                  *.*                     
LISTEN

I'm not sure how or why there are two entries for port 465. I do not  
have my master.cf file set to accept incoming 465, so I'm not  
convinced that this is the problem. I suspect a port problem, but I  
can't nail it down. amavis is using port 10025, but I suspect that the  
internal conversation is on port 10024, if I read the mail header  
properly (no guarantee...).

Anyone have any thoughts/suggestions? Thanks.

T. 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day 
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on 
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with 
Crystal Reports now.  http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test

Reply via email to