Opps, I think I've missed something... "the standard way"... What standard way? If subjectfilenames is set to enabled, and move2num is disabled, what other way is there to make sure maxfiles is never exceded?
Cheers Steve Sent from my iPhone On 11.09.2009, at 23:08, "Fritz Borgstedt" <f...@iworld.de> wrote: > ASSP development mailing list <assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net> > schreibt: >> >> However, in discussions with Thomas, it seems that you can use MaxAge >> with Bayesian, subjectfilenames enabled and move2num disabled. Is >> this >> statement correct? > > You can, but it would be not recommended. The standard way works much > better: It deletes old files up to the point that the number of files > is below MaxFiles. > > > --- > --- > --- > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 > 30-Day > trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and > focus on > what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with > Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july > _______________________________________________ > Assp-test mailing list > Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test