Version 12 does a really nice job of letting us click on the date for
block reports to admins.  Thanks so much.  AND I put in a dummy line
to a regular user in the schedule file and also one sent in manually
from my admin address and that user got the report without the links.
PERFECT!

The implementation of searching for from when that's different from
the mail from is really nice too.  Thanks for getting that in there.
Still, I'm seeing some types of mail where the from and mail from are
the same (one time use garbage), but the reply to or list-from are
different (and what should be whitelisted).  Any chance of putting any
address in the header line that identifies the sender that differs
from mail from?

The block report still seemed to run nice and quick.

One minor thing, my test request was something like
*...@*=>regularu...@ourdomain=>1

It worked as expected BUT the subject said 2 blocked emails, when
there were actually hundreds in the email.  It looks like that count
of 2 comes from the last email address in the report.



On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 2:46 PM, K Post <[email protected]> wrote:
> Thanks.
>
> I don't know what the mail from is considered to be when parsing
> through the scheduled daily block reports.  That should probably be
> considered too.
>
> (and off topic - I'm still really worried about a whitelisted sender
> in the from: line seemingly not making a message being considered to
> be from a whitelisted sender.  Also, my points on having different
> settings on matching for white consideration and what sender addresses
> get added  when there is a match - separate single thread on both of
> those topics, but as long as I've got your attention here, I thought
> I'd mention it again)
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 12:59 PM, Thomas Eckardt/eck
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> You are right - this has to be corrected.
>>
>> if inside a report request a recipient is defines which is not an admin -
>> the link will be not added  -> 5.12.
>>
>> Thomas
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> K Post <[email protected]>
>> 01.11.2009 18:15
>> Bitte antworten an
>> ASSP development mailing list <[email protected]>
>>
>>
>> An
>> ASSP development mailing list <[email protected]>
>> Kopie
>>
>> Thema
>> Re: [Assp-test] added to 2.0.1_RC0.5.11
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> The part that I was hung up on was determining when it was an admin
>> user that was GETTING the report, not requesting it.
>>
>> You seem to determine whether the link will appear based on the mail
>> from address, not the recipient address.
>>
>>    if (   matchSL( $this->{mailfrom}, 'EmailAdmins', 1 )
>>        or lc( $this->{mailfrom} ) eq lc($EmailAdminReportsTo)
>>        or lc( $this->{mailfrom} ) eq lc($EmailBlockTo) )
>>    {
>>        $isadmin = 1;
>>
>> If I'm understanding correctly, this means that if I as an admin email
>> a request for a report to a regular user, they'll get the links right?
>>  Definitely don't want that.
>>
>> Also, there's the BlockReportFile option.  We have block reports go to
>> each deparatement head on a nightly (doing a wildcard for their
>> subdomains do they can see blocked emails for anyone in their
>> department).  They're NOT admins though.  I'm not sure if this would
>> show the links for them or not.
>>
>> I think what we need to do is put the filename in each body line and
>> then when the SendBlockReport sub runs, we check the TO here.  If that
>> to is an admin then to a regex to replace the filename in the body
>> variable with a link and if it's not an admin, just remove the
>> filename.  That might not be the best solution, but I'm pretty sure
>> that we at least need to be checking the recipient in that sub,
>> instead of checking the requestor.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 12:00 PM, K Post <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> many thanks!  You're (obviously) much better at this than I am.  i'm
>>> still hacking through the code.
>>>
>>> When you have a moment, can you readdress the issues I'm seeing with
>>> nogreedywhitelist?
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Thomas Eckardt/eck
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>> the following is added to 2.0.1_RC0.5.11
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> - ['BlockReportHTTPName','My HTTP Name','The hostname for HTTP(S) links
>> in
>>>> AdminUsers Blockreports. If not defined the local hostname will be
>> used.',
>>>>
>>>> The date in every HTTP-AdminUsers-Blockreport line contains a http link
>> to
>>>> open the .eml file like in MaillogTail, if the file exists.
>>>>
>>>> Thomas
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> DISCLAIMER:
>>>> *******************************************************
>>>> This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential,
>> legally
>>>> privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of
>> the
>>>>
>>>> individual to whom it is addressed.
>>>> This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no
>>>> known virus in this email!
>>>> *******************************************************
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
>>>> is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart
>> your
>>>> developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and
>> stay
>>>> ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now!
>>>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Assp-test mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
>> is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
>> developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay
>> ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now!
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference
>> _______________________________________________
>> Assp-test mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> DISCLAIMER:
>> *******************************************************
>> This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally
>> privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of the
>>
>> individual to whom it is addressed.
>> This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no
>> known virus in this email!
>> *******************************************************
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
>> is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
>> developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay
>> ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now!
>> http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference
>> _______________________________________________
>> Assp-test mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
>>
>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Come build with us! The BlackBerry(R) Developer Conference in SF, CA
is the only developer event you need to attend this year. Jumpstart your
developing skills, take BlackBerry mobile applications to market and stay 
ahead of the curve. Join us from November 9 - 12, 2009. Register now!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/devconference
_______________________________________________
Assp-test mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test

Reply via email to