>>Let's make it more clear for us dummies out there. >No - this is a professional version !
I can't tell if you're being serious or not, but how are we supposed to have known, short of looking at the code, what that norm number means? I don't mean to argue, just discuss. I'll write the code and provide it here, if you don't want to use it, that's fine (always) - no hard feelings. You seem to agree with me at least in part - if there's a problem with the norm, you already give a great pointer like this: Corpus norm: 0.1074 Corpus norm should be between 0.6 and 1.4 Recommendation: You need more spam messages in the corpus. I'm just saying that if it is 0.67 that we should have corpus norm: 0.6700 (sightly ham heavy) You're already putting things in each and every rebuild log like: Nov-08-09 08:15:00 Do Not Collect Messages with RedListed address: Enabled **Messages with RedListed addresses will be removed from the corpus!** I'm not sure why you'd feel that this 2 line reminder is needed in every log, but a good reminder of what the corpus norm number means (which is very important IMHO) isn't a good idea. On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Thomas Eckardt/eck <[email protected]> wrote: >>Let's make it more clear for us dummies out there. > > No - this is a professional version ! > > Thomas > > > > > K Post <[email protected]> > 08.11.2009 16:16 > Bitte antworten an > ASSP development mailing list <[email protected]> > > > An > ASSP development mailing list <[email protected]> > Kopie > > Thema > Re: [Assp-test] fixes and changes in 2.0.1_RC0.5.16 > > > > > > > First, holy cow! Thanks for all of those changes in 2.0.1 rc 0.5.16. > > 1) Whitelisting emails are now working. That's huge. > > 2) I found the issue with the embedded analyze info in the ham/spam > reports. If "Spam and Ham Reports will trigger an additional Analyze > Report (DoAdditionalAnalyze)" is set to send a report, doesn't matter > to whom, then a report is generated AND in the ham/spam reply there's > an analysis too. This is true in 0.5.16. > > Like this: > > Thank you for your not-spam report. > Your report will help ASSP better detect spam messages in the future. > > > Subject: The message subject > Feature Matching: > > Whitelist: '[email protected]' > > Bayesian Analysis: > Bad Words:Bad Prob Good > Words:Good Prob > > Totals: > > > Spam/Ham Probabilities: > > > Spam Probability: > probability 0.5000 > > > If I set DoAdditionalAnalyze to none, then this report doesn't appear > in the reply. I want a report to go to the sender and an analyze to > me, but i don't want the analyze in the user reply. > > > 3) On occasion, it appears that there are duplicate whitelist status > lines like this: > > [email protected] is not on Whitelist > [email protected] is not on Whitelist > > In this example original email that address was the to and reply-to. > > > 4) While we're on this topic, I think it would be better if in the > ham/spam report replies if we changed it so the original subject > appears in parentethis. So instead of > Spam Report Received Original Subject > it would be > Spam Report Received (Original Subject) > > It's just easier to read that way. "Spam Report Received" is what we > have the subject configured as fyi. > > > 5) Last, with Outlook 2007, with the report emails (and other emails > from ASSP, like rebuild reports), I'm getting "Extra line breaks in > this message were removed." In #3 above, those two whitelist report > lines were actually on the same line. The message that we put for > not-spam reports: > > Thank you for your not-spam report. > Your report will help ASSP better detect spam messages in the future. > > which is on 2 lines in the editor (lines 2 and 3, with 1 being the > subject), shows as one line. > > In the rebuild reports most lines start on their own line, but those > that are supposed printed on 2 lines like > Nov-08-09 08:15:00 Do Not Collect Messages with RedListed address: Enabled > **Messages with RedListed addresses will be removed from the corpus!** > > Which appears on 2 lines in the admin editor, but as > > Nov-08-09 08:15:00 Do Not Collect Messages with RedListed address: > Enabled **Messages with RedListed addresses will be removed from the > corpus!** > > in outlook 2007. > > > (ok, one more thing, unrelated) in the rebuild log, it would be nice > when printing the corpus norm, if we indicated that, 1 is perfect, > less indicates that the corpus is ham heavy, more indicates that the > corpus is spam heavy. between .6 and 1.4 is an acceptable range. How > about doing something like: > > Nov-08-09 08:47:17 Corpus norm: 1.1248 (slightly spam heavy) > Nov-08-09 08:47:17 Corpus norm: 0.9000 (slightly ham heavy) > Nov-08-09 08:47:17 Corpus norm: 0.0548 (very ham heavy) - and > print > the existing warning > Nov-08-09 08:47:17 Corpus norm: 1.9548 (very spam heavy) - and > print > the existing warning > > I may actually have the ham/spam ratio backwards, which emphasises my > point. Let's make it more clear for us dummies out there. > > Thanks for keeping these revisions coming out so frequently and for > implementing so many of my suggestions. ASSP just keeps getting > better and better. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 > 30-Day > trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus > on > what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with > Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july > _______________________________________________ > Assp-test mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test > > > > DISCLAIMER: > ******************************************************* > This email and any files transmitted with it may be confidential, legally > privileged and protected in law and are intended solely for the use of the > > individual to whom it is addressed. > This email was multiple times scanned for viruses. There should be no > known virus in this email! > ******************************************************* > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day > trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on > what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with > Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july > _______________________________________________ > Assp-test mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Assp-test mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
