Ken, Your correct. My exchange (2007, edge transport) is connected to the relay port. Under the description, that's how exchange/lotus notes will connect to auto-update nonspam/spam db and whitelist.
I set it up this was after following some instructions (I'll try to find them again)... I'm guessing this must have been a design change between 1.x and 2.x - which is why, in principle our setup's are the same, but the way we've implemented is different (I mean, my install was fresh, and yours was an 'upgrade') Steve On 11/9/09 5:21 PM, "K Post" <[email protected]> wrote: > (this was originally a discussion about the email interface not > working 100%, an issue that has been resolved. It morphed into a > discussion about Exchange, so it was moved to a new thread. The > original discussion appears quoted below) > > > Steve- > > We're set up slightly differrently for inbound mail. > > ASSP->EXCHANGE > > there is no smarthost there. > > Outbound mail follows your path > > EXCHANGE -> ASSP -> SMARTHOST > > For outbound mail, we just connect exchange directly to assp's > listenPort (port 25), the standard port that mail comes in to for > external senders. Exchange doesn't need to authenticate, it just goes > through just like an authenticated sender would, because its IP is in > accept all mail. > > How is your ASSP destined exchange outbound mail being accepted. > Through a relay port I presume? > > We've been running like this for a couple of years, before relayport > was even an option. Seems fine, but maybe I'm missing something and > relayport would be better. > > > > > > 2009/11/9 ?????????? ?????? (Steve Mallindine) <[email protected]>: > > - Hide quoted text - >> Ken, >> >> Just checked my setup, and I¹m definitely not using ŒacceptAllMail¹ >> >> I¹m also using: >> >> Smarthost -> ASSP -> Exchange >> Exchange -> ASSP -> Smarthost >> >> However, you mention that its going to ASSP port 25....is that the standard >> port 25 in SMTP Listen Port (listenPort) (in Network Setup) or is it Relay >> Port (relayPort) (in Relaying) >> >> >> >> Steve >> >> >> On 11/6/09 11:34 PM, "K Post" <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Steve. This doesn't appear to be an exchange specific issue. We're >>> using ASSP 2.0.1 rc 0.5.15 fyi. I just did a test from a remote user who is >>> using Eudora (yep, Eudora) and sending via authenitcated SMTP. We currently >>> have white reporting set to reply to sender only. She got a reply that the >>> address was already whitelisted, which it is not. The message never touched >>> exchange nor was MSFT outlook to blame. I think there's a logic error >>> somewhere in ASSP all of a sudden. Anyway, the exchange setup (2003) is >>> pretty basic. The users who are set up on the exchange servers (not all >>> users >>> are) connect to exchange using Outlook 2007. One their mail hits the >>> exchange >>> server, it goes out via smtp to our ASSP server (smarthost), which then >>> sends >>> to the main mail server. So: Exchange => ASSP port 25 => regular mail >>> server >>> port 25 (all separate machines). We have the exchange IP setup as accept all >>> mail so that all mail coming from there gets added to the not spam folder. >>> We've been doing it this way for 3-4 years. Whitelist additions worked fine >>> this way when we were using 1.4x. The problem started with 2.0.1, though >>> I don't know when. Thanks. On Fri, Nov 6, 2009 at 2:02 PM, >>> ?????????? ?????? (Steve Mallindine) <[email protected]> wrote: > Ken, > > How >>> have you got your ASSP/Exhange setup configured? > > I'm running 2 assp >>> servers connected to an Exchange 2007 edge > transport server, and I don't >>> remember ever setting acceptAllMail... > > Steve > > Sent from my iPhone > > >>> On 06.11.2009, at 19:56, "K Post" <[email protected]> wrote: > >> >>> Update. >> >> 1a) Whitelisting actually isn't working perfectly if set to >>> reply to >> sender. I just did a test from an exchange user. The exchange >>> box >> connects to assp to send mail out via its acceptAllMail Ip >>> address. >> >> The user (not admin) DID get a reply and have the email >>> address >>> in the >> body of the email, but it said that it was already on the >>> whitelist, >> which is wasn't. >> >> It did only show the address once >>> though. >>> This is with reply set to >> sender only. >> >> >> 2) I removed the >>> EmailAdmins entry complete, but when I sent an >> address from my address >>> (which used to be an EmailAdmins and also goes >> through exchange first), >>> #2 >>> in my first email still happened. >> Addresses not shown in the email. So >>> there's something else that is >> causing that problem... I can't >>> understand >>> why my, previously admin, >> address would never show the email in the >>> report, >>> but the other >> addresses to. They all follow the same path. >> >> >> >>> These >>> tests all come through exchange first and then to assp via an >> >>> acceptAllMail >>> IP address. Could that be the root cause of all of >> this? >> >> --- >> >>> --- >> --- >> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day > trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on > what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with > Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july > _______________________________________________ > Assp-test mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Assp-test mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
