On 2010-06-25 4:53 AM, GrayHat wrote: > exactly my point; it doesn't make sense imHo allowing users to > change their passwords w/o checking them and then reject the > emails due to "weak passwords"; the password issue must be > dealt with at mailserver level
I don't think Matti meant that these should be *rejected*, that would be silly, and I also agree that anyone providing auth based relay services should *always* enforce strong passwords. Anyway, I just thought it was an interesting idea without really thinking more about it, but agree this really belongs on the MTA side of the equation. -- Best regards, Charles ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo _______________________________________________ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
