Just a suggestion-

Version numbers with ASSP have always been strange.  Now, I know that
there's the whole odd/even stable/dev schema, but this isn't simple.

I suggest releasing this not as 2.0.1_2.0.01, but instead as something like
2.1.0000.

It's illogical (to me at least) that 2.0.1_2.0.01 would be NEWER than
2.0.2_1.2.34

If you always had a .0000 be the stable release then you could have dev
releases increment that number.  So for example

2.1.0000 could be the stable release (same as 2.0.2_2.0.01).  We'd know this
is stable since it has 0000

Then when a bug is found or feature is added, we'd goto 2.1.0001, then
2.1.0002.  We'd keep incrementing until a new stable release is ready.  That
would become 2.2.0000.

Just my thoughts....
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports
standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1,  ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3.
Spend less time writing and  rewriting code and more time creating great
experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today
http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev
_______________________________________________
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test

Reply via email to