Just a suggestion- Version numbers with ASSP have always been strange. Now, I know that there's the whole odd/even stable/dev schema, but this isn't simple.
I suggest releasing this not as 2.0.1_2.0.01, but instead as something like 2.1.0000. It's illogical (to me at least) that 2.0.1_2.0.01 would be NEWER than 2.0.2_1.2.34 If you always had a .0000 be the stable release then you could have dev releases increment that number. So for example 2.1.0000 could be the stable release (same as 2.0.2_2.0.01). We'd know this is stable since it has 0000 Then when a bug is found or feature is added, we'd goto 2.1.0001, then 2.1.0002. We'd keep incrementing until a new stable release is ready. That would become 2.2.0000. Just my thoughts.... ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2 & L3. Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test