I'm also curious as to what people's best practice settings are. I will give
a brief rundown here - if other people could do the same it might help
everyone to tune their systems.

Validate Helo is set to score
Validate Sender set to block
Senderbase is set to score but country blocking is off as we have several
companies that trade internationally.
DNSBL is set to score however the score is set to higher than the spam
threshold so that I have only one place to configure the error message.
Lists are the following:

zen.spamhaus.org=>127.0.0.2=>1
zen.spamhaus.org=>127.0.0.3=>1
zen.spamhaus.org=>127.0.0.4=>1
zen.spamhaus.org=>127.0.0.5=>1
zen.spamhaus.org=>127.0.0.6=>1
zen.spamhaus.org=>127.0.0.7=>1
zen.spamhaus.org=>127.0.0.8=>1
bl.spamcop.net=>1
ix.dnsbl.manitu.net=>2
bb.barracudacentral.org=>2
bogons.cymru.com=>1
db.wpbl.info=>2
dnsbl-1.uceprotect.net=>2
psbl.surriel.com=>2
bl.spameatingmonkey.net=>127.0.0.2=>1
dnsrbl.swinog.ch=>3
dsn.rfc-ignorant.org=>1
bl.mailspike.net=>1

URIBL is disabled as we got a lot of false positives off it. I'd be
interested what lists and weights people give to their URIBL checks to make
them more accurate.

Bayes and HMM do my head in - despite putting tonnes of effort into
maintaining it we constantly get false positives. They are both set to
score. Currently baysValencePV is set to 30 and HMMValencePV set to 20 as
the last month or so has seen really bad results. Our spam threshold is 50.

Backscatter is set to block
No testmodes are on.
The collection/maintenance settings store the full file so that resends work
and they are kept for a max of 7 days. Correction folders are not cleaned
out.

Global penalty box is off - does anyone used this and find it useful? I
missed that you had to register and pay something (amount not specified).

Block reporting is on for some users, off for others. We want to get it on
for all so that users are all reporting errors to hopefully improve the
system.

ASSP_ARC is off
ASSP_DCC is set to score but I've never actually seen it do anything
ASSP_AFC is enabled and set to do both
ASSP_OCR is disabled. I found that with it enabled we were getting a message
scored by Bayes twice when it was a message sent in two formats (ie html
with a plain text version) and didn't have the time to figure out how to
compensate for that. Before disabling I set it to monitor but was surprised
to find that messages were still being blocked because of it. Disable was
the only way.

I suspect that a lot of our Bayes problems started when ASSP_OCR was
activated and we have never recovered.

-----Original Message-----
From: Grayhat [mailto:gray...@gmx.net] 
Sent: 27 September 2013 13:55
To: assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Assp-test] Virus scanners

 
> So far I have identified two domains that most mail claims as the from 
> address. Both publish SPF records but define ~all so I have added them 
> to strictSPFRe.

Hmmm... now I'm becoming curious; you're running ASSP, so, which filters did
you enable (set aside SPF and AV scanning) ? See, it sounds like you're
running w/o some filters (e.g. DNSBL/DNSWL and URIBL/URIWL)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most
from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and
register >
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60133471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
October Webinars: Code for Performance
Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance.
Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from 
the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register >
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60133471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Assp-test mailing list
Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test

Reply via email to