Things seem to be are working fine, but I started to wonder if there's any logic in having mail that is sent to no processing local addresses by whitelisted senders ever add to the whitelist.
For example, I came across a scenario where a local no process address (one that external volunteers use to submit their information to us) is set to no processing to help insure that messages get through, regardless of content. That works fine, but often staff here will reply from their address to the volunteer, which whitelists that volunteer's external address (also as expected). If I that volunteer now sends in an email to another non-processing address and cc's 10 other external people, those 10 people get whitelisted even though the email was sent to a no processing address. I know that I could also add this no processing address to NoAutoWhiteAddresses to avoid this, but I began wondering why this would be necessary. Is there a situation where an admin would want messages that are flagged as no-processing but sent by a whitelisted sender to stil contribute to the whitelist? I can't think of one. Is there any value to adding a NoProcessingContributesToWhitelist checkbox to allow admins to decide? If there's generally not a reason to have NP add to whitelist, giving us that option to globally exclude them from doing so would stop us from needing to maintain 2 the NP regex and NoAutoWhiteAddresses lists. In some cases, the NP might be a regex due to a wildcard, and NoAutoWhiteAddresses wouldn't work in that scenario. I bet I'm missing something obvious, but still figured that it might be worth a short discussion. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Assp-test mailing list Assp-test@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-test
