It's probably via an event sink on the mailbox store.  I doubt Exchange
itself is doing the sorting. 

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Aaron
Allen
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 10:16 AM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] SCL Header

I will continue to mess around with this.  Symantec somehow manages to
filter what it thinks as spam into the junk email folder always.  The
only thing I could figure out was it's SCL value.  Maybe Symantec just
integrates that well with exchange, but if there is a simple way to do
this, it would be a great feature.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Micheal
Espinola Jr
Sent: Wednesday, August 16, 2006 12:52 PM
To: Questions and Answers for users of ASSP Anti-Spam SMTP Proxy
Subject: Re: [Assp-user] SCL Header

Aaron Allen wrote:
> Good news and bad news... it seems that I was wrong about it working 
> for me (some are not getting pushed to the junk folder).  However, I 
> do not
>   

I have not been able to reproduce any similar results.  I think you are
seeing Outlook's poor spam recognition actually working - which does not
look for header fields.

> have exchange SP2 installed (working on that now).  SP2 adds 
> intelligent message filtering which supposedly enables the filtering 
> based on the SCL value, I'll let you all know if that works.
>   

I am using SP2 with IMF.  No luck here.  Everything I have read and
talked about with Redmond gurus says IMF performs an analysis and will
move an email to the Junk Mail folder on its own.  The SCL header is for
troubleshooting purposes, but also can be used for downstream client
Inbox rule filtering (custom filter per Inbox).

Problem is, no one will swear to this - but it is the consensus.

> What if we took the X-Assp-Spam-Prob number and did some 
> multiplication to come up with an SCL number?  It seems like the SCL 
> is the same thing, just on a different scale.

Again, I don't think it would matter per my comments above.  I have VB
code for creating custom Event Syncs to move messages to folders base on
headers (so Inbox rules are not necessary).  I think I am going to go
back to that route - after I catch up on some VB, and feel comfortable
installing it into Exchange.


------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services,
security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache
Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Assp-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user

------------------------------------------------------------------------
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services,
security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job
easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache
Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Assp-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Assp-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user

Reply via email to