Fritz Borgstedt wrote: >> I'm at work now and can't look at previous emails, but wasn't OP's >> original problem that he had a really low weight because he had way >> more >> ham than spam? I don't understand why these settings wouldn't solve >> the >> problem. Enlighten me, please, Fritz because I'm obviously confused. >> >> > > If you use numbers as filenames (what you should), the maximum number > of files in spam folder and notspam folder is limited by >maxfiles< > eg. 15000. > To change the frequency does not change this maximum number. It does > change the <frequency> of collecting. So after your collection has > reached 15000, there is no change in number of files for spam and > notspam. > > fritz > Wouldn't this be better then for a installation that isn't mature? For instance, I only have about 2000 spam in the directory and 500 nonspam so it seems like this will help me keep the weight down until my installation matures (reaches total files). I don't want to sound argumentative. I'm just trying to reach an understanding here.
------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
