Melvin,
    Yes, they don't like the subject tags. The header option is much 
better, thank you.


Kind regards,
Elvar



Melvin wrote:
> Are they complaining because you're tagging the subject?  If so then use 
> the headers instead and leave the subject alone.  They can still filter 
> based on the headers.  I've been doing that since day one because I 
> didn't want the SPAM stuff in the subject if it happens it wasn't and 
> the message then gets forwarded, etc.
>
> Elvar wrote:
>   
>> I agree billc, my users have often requested a per user quarantine that 
>> they can view and respond appropriately on without having mail tagged 
>> and delivered to their mail client. The majority of my users hate tagged 
>> email but also do not like the idea of not knowing if something was 
>> blocked / discarded. Without this ASSP has still been working very well 
>> and my favorite anti-spam solution to date.
>>
>>
>> Kind regards,
>> Elvar
>>
>>
>>
>> billc wrote:
>>   
>>     
>>> At 1:58 PM -0400 5/7/07, Charles Marcus wrote:
>>>   
>>>     
>>>       
>>>> The *only* potential thing that it has that ASSP doesn't is per-user
>>>> settings/quarantine. As someone else pointed out, this generally only
>>>> matters to large installs like ISPs, where their customers 'demand' it.
>>>>
>>>>     
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>> Though my customers are generally not tech savvy enough to know to 
>>> ask, we are a small ISP/webhost and would like to be able to have a 
>>> per-user quarantine area.  That would take some of the whining off of 
>>> me.  Though I'm well aware that they can do that themselves when 
>>> they're configured as Spam Lovers (and I do use it when necessary), 
>>> having a per-user quarantine area on the server would lower the 
>>> number of emails they'd have to download on a normal basis.
>>>
>>> If they didn't ever look in it and it auto-deleted the old stuff 
>>> nightly or weekly it would still serve the purpose of being able to 
>>> offer it and being the place they could look when their precious ebay 
>>> notices or whatever get caught by the filters.
>>>
>>> Otherwise, ASSP is doing a fine job.  But it never hurts to look at 
>>> what 'the competition' is doing.
>>>
>>>   
>>>     
>>>       
>>
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
>> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
>> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
>> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
>> _______________________________________________
>> Assp-user mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
>>
>>   
>>     
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
> _______________________________________________
> Assp-user mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
>   



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
_______________________________________________
Assp-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user

Reply via email to