Daniel L. Miller wrote: > Doug Traylor wrote: > >>> Is there a way for ASSP to take advantage of either spamassassin or >>> dspam for processing? >>> >>> >> Not at this time. Do you believe either of these to be functionally >> superior to ASSP's internal Bayesian checking? >> >> > Yes...though I don't have a significant qualitative benchmark for that > statement. My current config has ASSP on my firewall/relay server > (Postfix) and the internal server is still running Amavisd-New with > ClamAV and Spamassassin. While it's only a couple messages a day - the > internal filters still catch messages ASSP misses. > Pardon me for butting in, and I'm relatively new to ASSP (about 4 months) but not bayesian spam filters (a few years). It would seem to me that if SA is catching a few messages that ASSP misses, you need to send those messages to ASSP to be properly trained. In 4 months, I have relatively few misses either way.
Out of 54,857 emails, I have 82 corrections in error/notspam and 130 in errors/spam. Those statistics are from day one (assuming corrections are not deleted. From my dates, they aren't). ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now. http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/ _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
