I think the request for virus scoring comes not to score executable binary viruses, but to score the wide variety of non-virus items now caught by things like the MSRBL and SaneSecurity definitions. I also think that's why the feature was requested to use regexes, so that one could differentially score and separate executable w32. type viruses from email. and html. "viruses" caught by clamd with those defs.
Micheal Espinola Jr wrote: > Kevin wrote: > >> We don't score Virus hits, they are only blocked. Fritz says he does not >> see a valid reason to change this, i agree. >> > > Same here. An attachment is a virus or its not. This is a binary > issue: 1 or 0, on or off. When something is *fundamentally* bad for > you, why consider it as an amount? > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. > Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. > Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. > Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ > _______________________________________________ > Assp-user mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Still grepping through log files to find problems? Stop. Now Search log events and configuration files using AJAX and a browser. Download your FREE copy of Splunk now >> http://get.splunk.com/ _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
