Thanks alot everyone for the comments.

In the end I took BlackRe out too, if it was landing hits for having 5
spaces behind "Subject:" and/or having an url in the subject.

In fact I prefer to let a Spam pass than to have false positives, I am a
ISP for around 1000 customers and they lynch me if I disturb their
business. I have an urologe within my customers, and guess wich regexes
from BombRe matches wrong positives too.
Even using RBLs could generate false positives - I hope thats done with
RWL.

Ist like always: where is light, there is shadow too.

Even if there is something good 3 years old it could (or need) to come
up into discussion sometimes - to many things are changing.

What I still dont understand is the BlackRe itself - we have 
- bombSubjectRe
- bombRe (what reads the whole header, and Subject is IMO a part of
header?!)
- bombDataRe (for the f..ine rest of message)
And some others regexes, which I dont use atm.

But after try to understanding the RegEx-things better I think if i have
bombSubjectRe and bombRe both pointed to file:files/bombre.txt it is at
least double done (what means senseless waste of rare computingtime :).

Would be nice to get the differences clearyfied.

Christian Rehkopf




-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
Assp-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user

Reply via email to