Micheal Espinola Jr wrote: > On 9/21/07, Charles Marcus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Oh, ok, I see here you essentially agree that what you wrote before was >> plain wrong... > > > Not at all. Because in court, there is one plaintiff and one
> Since an email is sent to an individual recipient - where is the bulk, > and how would you prove or refer to it in court? Logically speaking (IANAL), I just wonder how on earth any court would accept a case based on one single email sent by one single individual, regarding it being spam (not an attachment containing a virus or anything). What possible damage can such an email cause? If it'd be an email with something like a death threat, I can understand, but then you talk about a whole different set of laws. Hence logic dictates, to me at least, spam email had better be bulk in order for anyone to make a case based on the fact it was spam. Regards, Jeroen ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
