I was exploring old threads for issues I need to study and came across this. (ASSP has been working so well Id forgotten about DSPAM) Then a collegue recently told me Symantec uses SA....jeez!
On the other hand, we all see industry-rag media reports (computer magazines) or training-bra I.T. sites (Digg/Slashdirt) that come out with "reviews" that are anything but...(they review 10% of a market segment and call it finished) These reviews (product placements) basically show a screenshot of the per-user mangement page of DSPAM. whoopee. Of course they dont tell you about installation, maintenance, performace, accuracy, etc. Im going to try to force the NIST '05 corpus (300mb tgz) into a test ASSP box and see what happens. http://plg1.cs.uwaterloo.ca/cgi-bin/cgiwrap/gvcormac/foo http://plg1.cs.uwaterloo.ca/cgi-bin/cgiwrap/gvcormac/foo -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Replacing-the-bayesian-engine-with-DSPAM--tf3702920.html#a14038369 Sent from the assp-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is sponsored by: The Future of Linux Business White Paper from Novell. From the desktop to the data center, Linux is going mainstream. Let it simplify your IT future. http://altfarm.mediaplex.com/ad/ck/8857-50307-18918-4 _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
