I think that is just an acknowledgement that it had been previously delayed. And as a result, it is not delayed after that because that's how delaying works. So, yes, it should have been successful.
> -----Original Message----- > From: Wim Borghs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, November 26, 2008 3:09 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Assp-user] delayed but not delayed? > > I just saw a mail that had both a header that indicated it > was delayed and a header that indicated it was not delayed: > > X-Assp-Delay: delayed for 5m 7s; 26 Nov 2008 03:41:59 +0100 > X-Assp-Delay: not delayed (auto accepted); 26 Nov 2008 03:41:59 +0100 > > using assp v2.0.0(7.12) ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
