Fritz, The line is below. Since the line number may be different in your code than mine, I tell you what I changed. All I did was put "height=16 width=16" in the second image tag in the block report html email definition in the function "genBlockReports".
As for the need for two links, I have a hard time understanding what sort of system incompatibility would lead to the need for two different differently formatted resend emails (with different "to" addresses and body contents). Whatever the reason, this leads to a real user interface problem that I would suggest needs to be corrected. As there are two resend links for each email in a block report, end users will get very confused. There is no explanation in the block report of the difference between these two links. Users therefore chose one randomly when they want a message resent. This means that there is a roughly %50 chance that they will not get a response. This in turn leads them to assume that the system is broken, at which point they will complain to the admin of the system (me). I would like to suggest that this issue be resolved somehow in future versions. Otherwise, there will be many frustrated and confused users. - Jason edited line of code: $line =~ s/(.*)/<tr bgcolor="$bgcolor" ><td WIDTH="20px" valign="top" align="center" style="border-bottom: 1px solid #C0C0C0"><a href="mailto:$EmailBlockReport$EmailBlockReportDomain \?subject=request\%20ASSP\%20to\%20resend\%20blocked\%20mail\%20from\ %20ASSP-host\%20$myName&body=\%23\%23\%23$filename\%23\%23\%23\%0D\ %0A"><img src=cid:1000 alt="request ASSP to resend this blocked email" border="0" width="16" height="16"><\/a><\/td><td WIDTH="94%" style="border-bottom: 1px solid #C0C0C0">$1<\/td><td align=center valign=high WIDTH="3%" style="border-bottom: 1px solid #C0C0C0"><a href="mailto:$ofilename$EmailBlockReportDomain\?&subject=request\ %20ASSP\%20to\%20resend\%20blocked\%20mail\%20from\%20ASSP-host\ %20$myName"><img src=cid:1000 alt="request ASSP to resend this blocked email" border=0 width="16" height="16"><\/a><\/td><\/tr>/; On Apr 9, 2009, at 12:28 PM, Fritz Borgstedt wrote: > For Users of ASSP <[email protected]> schreibt: >> I have edited my copy of assp.pl to >> correct this (line 15529), but it would be nice if the developers >> would take care of this for future revisions. > > > And why not sending us the line 15529 you put in? > > We use two links because up to now we did not find one link which is > working in all systems. > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > This SF.net email is sponsored by: > High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. > Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com > _______________________________________________ > Assp-user mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.net email is sponsored by: High Quality Requirements in a Collaborative Environment. Download a free trial of Rational Requirements Composer Now! http://p.sf.net/sfu/www-ibm-com _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
