On 9/9/2009 7:46 PM, Melvin wrote: >> Only mail destined for the internet should be contributing to the >> corpus, and of that, only for trusted users (I would never allow *all* >> of my users to contribute to the HAM corpus).
> I'm curious as to what criteria you use to determine who is or isn't a > 'trusted' user, and what type of environment you're that allows you that > latitude. I'm definitely working in the wrong place. :) PHBs generally don't have a clue, so unless you *tell* them you are redlisting them because they're an idiot, how would they even know? Real world example: My main client still hasn't let me roll out ASSP (they've been using webroots SaaS, and before that mxlogic for a long time and is comfortable with the current setup) and the owner of the company has the really, extremely bad habit of actually replying to 419 scammers (and other spammers) to tell them what he thinks of them when something slips through. Most of the Sales Reps there are clueless as well, and always end up signing up for all kinds of garbage when they register at some site for some stupid newsletter, then complaining loudly about all of the 'spam' they are getting. If/when they let me roll out ASSP there, I certainly won't be letting most of those users - including the boss - contribute to the HAM corpus, or even to the whitelist (via outbound mail). -- Best regards, Charles ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ Assp-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/assp-user
